Int J Curr Pharm Res, Vol 16, Issue 3, 36-41Original Article

QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYTOCONSTITUENTS IN THE UNANI FORMULATION HABB-E-BUKHAR

SEEMA FIRDOUSE1*, SHOYEB AHMED2, MOHAMMED ABDUL MUNAIM3

1,2Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Anwarul Uloom College of Pharmacy, Hyderabad, Telangana-500001, India. 3Anwarul Uloom College of Pharmacy, Hyderabad, Telangana-500001, India
*Corresponding author: Seema Firdouse; Email:
seemamiyna@gmail.com

Received: 24 Feb 2024, Revised and Accepted: 06 Apr 2024


ABSTRACT

Objective: Habb-e-Bukhar is a specific medication regimen in the traditional unani system for treating fever caused by conditions such as elephantiasis and intestinal diseases. It acts as both an Antipyretic and Diaphoretic to address acute fever.

Methods: The current research aims to analyze the qualitative and quantitative composition of Habb-e-Bukhar to assess the primary and secondary metabolites present in the sample extract. The study utilized a range of advanced analytical methods such as FTIR, AAS, HPLC, and GC-MS analysis. The sample was prepared through the maceration method, and an initial phytochemical screening revealed the presence of Alkaloids, Carbohydrates, Volatile oils, Flavonoids, Glycosides, Steroids, and triterpenoids.

Results: The Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy reveals the identification of functional groups at specific wavenumbers: 3960.26 for Amide, 3687.85 for Alcohol, 2765.05 for Aliphatic, and 2099.54 for Alkynes; as well as, at wavelength of 1641.55 denoting the presence of Alkenes (C=C). Moreover, findings from the Atomic Absorption spectrometer suggest that the drug contains notable levels of certain heavy metals, such as chromium at 0.00642 ppm, lead at 10.00 ppm, and argon at three ppm detected with precision in their respective wavelengths.

Conclusion: The GC-MS technique was utilized to detect and characterize the phytochemicals found in the ethanolic extract. The findings indicated the existence of seven constituents.

Keywords: Unani medicine, Habb-e-Bukhar, Phytoconstituents, FTIR, AAS, HPLC, GC-MS


INTRODUCTION

Herbal Medicinal Products consist of complex mixtures of one or more plants that contain a variety of medically active ingredients derived from plant parts or crude plant extracts. The use of HMPs in treating certain human ailments has become widespread, particularly in rural areas [1]. This trend is due to the high costs and side effects associated with most conventional medications, as well as the perception that HMPs are effective and safer alternatives. While HMPs are generally considered safe, they may contain toxic and potentially harmful components [2].

Unani medicine is a recognized traditional medical system in India, falling under the umbrella of AYUSH, which encompasses Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy. Habb-e-Bukhar is a polyherbal tablet formulation from the Unani system used for treating elephantiasis and malarial fever [3]. Its ingredients include Bambusa bambos Druce, Cinchona officinalis, Tinospora cordifolia, and Acacia arabica Willd. The tablet was designed to treat fevers as well as common colds and coughs according to Unani terminology; it is beneficial for various types of phlegmatic (balghami), bilious (safrawi), and compound fevers (murakkab bukhar) [4].

Kanakana (cinchona officinalis)-The active component quinine is being explored by some countries as a potential treatment or medication with promising activity against Coronavirus. Satt-e-Gilo (tinospora cardifolia), Miers is reported to have potent antiviral effects against HSV and has been suggested for immune-boosting activity [5, 6]. Tabasheer (bambussa bambosa): It is beneficial in treating involuntary muscle spasms, bronchial asthma, fever, bacterial infection, Diabetes etc. Samagh-e-Arabi-It enhances sexual desire and offers benefits for respiratory infections. Additionally, it is used as a local astringent douche or enema in gonorrhea, cystitis, vaginitis leucorrhoea, piles etc [7].

Isolation and characterization of bioactive compounds from medicinal plants are crucial for pharmaceutical development. Analytical techniques play a key role in the discovery, advancement, and production of pharmaceuticals. However, the process of isolating pharmacologically active elements from plant extracts is lengthy and laborious. Previous research has not thoroughly addressed this aspect, and there is insufficient available material for it [7, 8]. The present study to screen the primary and secondary metabolites and to improve analysis performance by utilising advanced methods such as High-Performance Chromatography, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, Atomic absorption spectroscopy, and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. The results obtained will facilitate further research opportunities and demonstrate the potential use of Habb-e-Bukhar as a natural alternative for medical treatment [9, 10].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Drug procurement

The drug sample was procured from local medical Hamdard Dawakana, Nampally, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Preparation of ethanolic extract

Habb-e-Bukhar tablets should be ground into a fine powder using a mortar and pestle. The powdered drug was dissolved in 100 ml of ethanol as the solvent, followed by sonication for 3 min at 40 °C. Subsequently, the sample is kept for 24h, and then it should be filtered to collect the filtrate for subsequent analysis [9-11].

Phytochemical screening

The ethanol-based extract was utilized to conduct phytochemical screening tests in order to assess the characteristics of the active components present [12-14, 19, 20].

Fourier Transform Infrared Radiation (FTIR)

Zinc-selenium ATR plates served as the window material in the Alpha-Bruker FTIR equipped with Opus-7.5 version, covering a spectral range of 4000-500 cm⁻¹. The light source was a SiC glower and employed an RMS voltage of 1.8x10⁻² for the 1x1 mm-sized detector element. With an FT size of 16K and optimized operating bandwidth at 5 kHz using the amplifier, a total of 16 scans were performed at resolution settings. The interferometer modulated the infrared light from the radiation source before it reached the sample compartment and then to the detector, which captured signals to produce an interferogram for evaluating functional groups present in the sample [15, 16].

Atomic Absorption Spectrometry AAS

The sample was weighed 0.5g and placed in a 100 ml beaker and subjected to acid digestion. To the sample, add 5 ml of 65% HNO3 and the mixtures were boiled for 30 min and then after cooling add 70% HClO4, and the mixtures was gently boiled until dense fumes appeared. later the mixture was allowed to cool. Add 10 ml of deionised water until the fumes are released [17].

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

Atlantis BEH C18 (250 X 4.6 mm i. d, 5m particle size) is utilized for chromatographic separation. At ambient temperature, a mobile phase combination of formic acid in water and formic acid in acetonitrile at a ratio of 50:50% by volume is employed, with a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min, UV detection at 229 nm, an injection volume of 5 ul, and a total run time of 15.0 min [18, 22].

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GCMS)

The Agilent 6890GC with 5973N MSD and an HP 5MS column (30 mm x 0.25 mm ID x 0.25 thickness) was used for GC-MS analysis of the sample. Helium served as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 ml/min with a split ratio of 10:1. The injection temperature started at 40 °C, ramping up to a final temperature of 280 °C, while the ionization source remained constant at 230o. The oven temperature increased from 150 °C to 300 °C at a rate of 10 °C per min. A scan interval of 0.5 sec covered fragments ranging from 29 to 600Daltons with in a total running time of 32 min. The NIST database helped interpret the obtained GC-Mass spectrum by comparing the sample's unknown components to known components in the database library, determining their names, molecular weights, and molecular formulas, and retention time [19, 21, 23-25].

RESULTS

Phytochemical screening

The ethanolic extract was subjected to preliminary phytochemical screening, shows the presence of Alkaloids, carbohydrates, volatile oil, flavonoids, glycosides Steroids and triterpenoids as shown in table 1.

FTIR analysis

FTIR analysis confirms the presence of Amide, Alcohols, Aliphatic hydrocarbons, S-OR, and Esters.

HPLC analysis

HPLC confirms the presence of bioactive components at various retention time 2.66. 2.82, 3.14, 5.67,6.09,7.81,7.99 and 8.92. This analytical technique is useful for both qualitative and quantitative estimation.

Table 1: Phytochemical screening

S. No. Phytochemical test Results
1 Alkaloid +
2 Amino acids -
3 Carbohydrates +
4 Volatile oils +
5 Flavonoids +
6 Glycosides +
7 Tannins -
8 Steroids +
9 Triterpenoids +
10 Proteins -

Note: +indicates = present, -indicate = absent

Fig. 1: Interferogram of ethanolic extract of Habb-e-Bukhar

Table 2: Heavy metal analysis by AAS

S. No. Heavy metal Wavelength Valve
1 Chromium (cr) 357.9 nm 0.0064
2 Lead (Pb) 283.3 nm 0.0005
3 Arsenic (Ar) 350 nm 0.001

Fig. 2: HPLC chromatogram of ethanolic extract of habb-e-bukhar

Fig. 3: GC-MS chromatogram of ethanolic extract of habb-e-bukhar

Fig. 3a: 1,1-Diethoxyethane

Fig. 3b: Diethyl phthalate

Fig. 3c: Caffeine

Fig. 3d: 1H-Purine-2,6-dione, 3,7-dihydro-1,3,7-trimethyl-caffeine

Fig. 3e: Dibutyl phthalate

Fig. 3f: 2-methyl-5H-dibenzo[b,f]azepine

Fig. 3g: Quinine

Table 4: Different phytoconstituents detected in ethanolic extract of habb-e-bukhar

S. No. Retention time (Rt) Compound name Molecular formula

Molecular

weight (g/mol)

Percentage area Pub chem (CID)
1 2.942 1,1-Diethoxyethane C6H14O2 118.174 1.83 19991827
2 15.62 Diethyl Phthalate C1H14O4 222.24 2.16 6781
3 18.47 Caffeine C8H10N4O2 194.19 74.84 2519
4 19.54 Dibutyl phthalate C16H22O4 278.34 1.87 3026
5 25.613 1H-Purine-2,6-dione, 3,7-dihydro-1,3,7-trimethyl-Caffeine C8H11ClN4O2 230.65 0.48 22181
6 25.704 2-methyl-5H-dibenzo[b,f]azepine C15H13N 207.27 0.75 12498159
7 27.65 Quinine C20H24N2O2 324.4 17.89 3034034

DISCUSSION

Plants produce a variety of bioactive molecules making them a wealthy supply of various forms of medicines. Various strategies are hired for his or her investigation which incorporates bioassays for chemical screening and their assessment for the presence of biological activities.

This study was done to identify the phytoconstituents present in the ethanolic extract of Habb-e-Bukhar by utilizing the GC-MS Examination. The ethanolic extract was prepared by maceration technique. The preliminary phytochemical screening tests revealed the presence of Alkaloids, carbohydrates, Glycosides, Flavonoids, Volatile Oil, Steroids, and Terpenoids.

FTIR analysis of ethanolic extract of Habb-e-Bukhar resulted in the identification of different functional groups present determined from the peak obtained. The peaks valves were 3960.26, 3687.85, 3326.43, 3004.03, 2765.05, 2602.94, 2099.54, 1641.55, 1512.70, 1224.80, 1066.08, 993.71,861.60; which constitutes for the following functional groups such as Amide(N-H), Alcohol (O-H), Amide (N-H), Aliphatic (C-H), Alkynes, Alkenes (C=C), Ester (C=0), Alkanes (C-C) and S-OR as listed in table 2.

Heavy metal analysis by using Atomic Absorption Spectrometer shows the quantity of heavy metals present in the drug (cr) 0.00642 ppm, (Pb) 10.00 ppm (Ar) 3 ppm at particular wavelengths.

HPLC confirms the presence of bioactive components at various retention time 2.66. 2.82, 3.14, 5.67,6.09,7.81,7.99 and 8.92. This analytical technique is useful for both qualitative and quantitative estimation GC-MS analysis of ethanolic extract of of Habb-e-Bukhar found seven phytochemical constitutents such as 1,1-Diethoxyethane, Diethyl Phthalate, Caffeine, Dibutyl phthalate, 2-methyl-5H-dibenzo[b,f]azepine, Quinine, and 1-hexyl-4-nitro benzene. The aftereffect of GC-MS examination affirmed the presence of 7 mixtures. The retention time, % peak area, molecular formula and molecular weight as shown in table 4.

CONCLUSION

This study has been conducted due to increased awareness of lifestyle diseases and unhealthy eating habits. Herbal medicinal products are gaining popularity among people all over the world. 'Habb-e-Bukhar' a medication detailing in Unani arrangement of medication. It is an antipyretic. Initially phytochemical screening tests were done to decipher the nature of the components present in the ethanolic sample. Further separation, determination of functional groups and identification of phytoconstituents were done using techniques such as FTIR, AAS, HPLC and GC-MS; all these techniques were appropriately giving benignant results. The conformation of bioactive components obtained was matched with NIST library of IICT. This thorough research work contributes for beneficial usage of Habb-e-Bukhar in herbal medicine as well as grants scope for further study and investigation to be undertaker to explore vast knowledge regarding the plant, its constituents, their uses, and its pharmacological effects. This research assess us that Habb-e-Bukhar is used multipurpose category for various diseases.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We acknowledge Anwarul Uloom College of Pharmacy for providing a research facility, and we additionally thank my colleague Dr. Hemanth Sudheer for his motivation.

FUNDING

Nil

AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS

All authors have contributed equally

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare no conflict of interest

REFERENCES

  1. Steinhoff B. Review: quality of herbal medicinal products: state of the art of purity assessment. Phytomedicine. 2019;60:153003. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2019.153003, PMID 31327654.

  2. Opuni KF, Asare Nkansah S, Osei Fosu P, Akonnor A, Bekoe SO, Dodoo AN. Monitoring and risk assessment of pesticide residues in selected herbal medicinal products in Ghana. Environ Monit Assess. 2021;193(8):470. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-09261-1, PMID 34226978.

  3. NFUM. National formulary of Unani medicine. Part I, 1st Reprint. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Department of AYUSH), Government of India; 2006. p. 13.

  4. Aisha AA, Tabassum K, Ambar S. Tabasheer (Bambusa arundinaceae Retz.) a plant origin drug of unani medicine-a review. J Ayu Her Med. 2019;5(1):31-4. doi: 10.31254/jahm.2019.5109.

  5. Ahmad N, Nawab M, Qamar U. Medicinal properties of gilo (Tinospora cordifolia)-a review. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2019;8:430-40.

  6. Sharma P, Dwivedee BP, Bisht D, Dash AK, Kumar D. The chemical constituents and diverse pharmacological importance of Tinospora cordifolia. Heliyon. 2019;5(9):e02437. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02437, PMID 31701036.

  7. Tiwari P, Nayak P, Prusty SK, Sahu PK. Phytochemistry and pharmacology of tinospora cordifolia: a review. Syst Rev Pharm. 2018;9(1):70-8. doi: 10.5530/srp.2018.1.14.

  8. Roqaiya M, Begum W, Jahufer R. Acacia arabica (babool)-a review on ethnobotanical and unani traditional uses as well as phytochemical and pharmacological properties. Int J Pharm Phytopharmacol Res. 2015;4(6):315-21.

  9. Meenu VT, Virmani T, Singh L, Kaushik R. Phytochemical screening, GC-MS analysis and total phenolic content determination of bioactive compound of propolis. Int J Drug Deliv Technol. 2023;13(3):884-93. doi: 10.25258/ijddt.13.3.18.

  10. Mobeen A, Siddiqui MA, Quamri MA, Itrat M, Khan MdI. Therapeutic potential of ushaq (Dorema ammoniacum D. Don): a unique drug of unani medicine. Int J Unani Integ Med. 2018;2(1):11-6. doi: 10.33545/2616454X.2018.v2.i1a.17.

  11. Pradhan PC, Kori ML. Preliminary pharmacological screening of corchorus olitorius extracts for anti-inflammatory and wound healing activity. IJPSDR. 2023;15(5):556-63. doi: 10.25004/IJPSDR.2023.150502.

  12. Kokate CK. Practical Pharmacognosy, vallabh Prakhashan. New Delhi; 1996. p. 107-8.

  13. Ram M, Ram Krishna Rao M, Anisha G, Prabhu K, Shil S, Nagarajan V. Preliminary phytochemical and gas chromatography mass spectrometry study of one medicinal plant Carissa carandas. Drug Invent Today. 2019 Aug 1;12:1629-30.

  14. Elgailani IE. Spectrophotometric analysis of some metals and phytochemical screening of Digera muricata (Leaves and stems). Pak J Pharm Sci. 2018;31(5):1923-6. PMID 30150190.

  15. Firdouse S, Gupta J, Alam P. Fingerprint analysis of an ethanolic extract of Amorphophallus campanulatus decline tuber. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2016;5(2):1576-80.

  16. Firdouse S, Gupta J, Parwez Alam. FTIR analysis of ethanolic and chloroform extracts of Amorphophallus campanulatus decne tuber. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2016;5(2):861-6.

  17. Uddin AH, Khalid RS, Alaama M, Abdualkader AM, Kasmuri A, Abbas SA. Comparative study of three digestion methods for elemental analysis in traditional medicine products using atomic absorption spectrometry. J Anal Sci Technol. 2016;7(1):1-7.

  18. Nag M, Kar A, Chanda J, Mukherjee PK. RP-HPLC analysis of methanol extract of Viscum articulatum. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2020;11(3):277-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2018.02.135, PMID 30638917.

  19. Anita A, Selvaraj D. GC-MS analysis and molecular docking of plant-based compounds from medicinal plant Sida acuta Burm F. for antibacterial potential. IJPSDR. 2023;15(3):291-301. doi: 10.25004/IJPSDR.2023.150309.

  20. Suryavanshi A, Saxena AM. Bioactive compounds profiling in Rumex vesicarius and Terminalia catappa plants using GC-MS. UPJOZ. 2022;43:53-9. doi: 10.56557/upjoz/2022/v43i12884.

  21. Lalitharani S, Mohan VR, Regini GS. GC-MS analysis of ethanolic extract of Zanthoxylum rhetsa (roxb.) dc spines. J Herb Med Toxicol. 2010;4:191-2.

  22. Ramya B, Malarvili T, Velavan S. GC-MS analysis of bioactive compounds in Bryonopsis laciniosa fruit extract. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2015;6(8):3375-9.

  23. Kichenamourty G, Vellapandian C. Phytochemical studies and identification of bioactive compounds using high-performance liquid chromatography and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of leaf extract of jatropha curcas. Int J Pharm Qual Assur. 2022;13(4):358-62. doi: 10.25258/ijpqa.13.4.03.

  24. Tomer N, Ali MI, Moin S. Evaluation of bioactive potential of the Digera muricata Mart. Int J Pharm Qual Assur. 2022;13(4):402-7. doi: 10.25258/ijpqa.13.4.10.

  25. Belho NA, Veswuh R, Solo P. GC-MS analysis and in-silico docking study of active antifungal components of entada rheedei spreng. (Seeds). IJPSDR 2023;15(6):695-712. doi: 10.25004/IJPSDR.2023. 150603.