Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, Vol 8, Issue 10, 251-256Original Article

**ANTIMICROBIAL AND IN SILICO ADMET SCREENING OF NOVEL (E)-N-(2-(1H-INDOL-3-YL-AMINO) VINYL)-3-(1-METHYL-1H-INDOL-3-YL)-3-PHENYLPROPANAMIDE DERIVATIVES**

K. S. MANJUNATHA, N. D. SATYANARAYAN, S. HARISHKUMAR

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Kuvempu University, Post Graduate Centre, Kadur 577548, Chikmagalur Dt. Karnataka, India
Email: satya1782005@gmail.com

Received: 07 Jul 2016 Revised and Accepted: 23 Aug 2016

ABSTRACT

Objective: Synthesis, in silico absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, toxicity (ADMET) and in vitro antimicrobial screening of (E)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-ylamino) vinyl)-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanamide derivatives.

Methods: (E)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-ylamino) vinyl)-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-3 phenylpropane-amide derivatives were synthesized by combining indole ethanolamine and substituted Meldrum’s adduct. The synthesized compounds were subjected to in vitro antimicrobial study by cup plate method and in silico ADMET properties using ACD/I-Lab 2.0.

Results: The in vitro antimicrobial screening against precarious pathogenic microorganisms viz, Pseudomonas aureginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Vibrio cholerae, and the antifungal activity against Candida albicans, Aspergillus niger, Penicillin chrysogenum and Cladosporium oxysporum strains. The results revealed that compounds 5b, 5c, 5d and 5e showed good antimicrobial property and obeyed the in silico pharmacokinetic parameters.

Conclusion: The encouraging results exhibited by the compounds (E)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-ylamino) vinyl)-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenyl propanamide derivatives, 5(a-e) can be explored as possible hits in antimicrobial therapy. The molecules obey the Lipinski rule of five when tested in silico and can be used in understanding the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) parameters.

Keywords: Antimicrobial, ADMET, Phenylpropanamide, Meldrum’s adduct, Indole and Nitro methane

© 2016 The Authors. Published by Innovare Academic Sciences Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4. 0/)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22159/ijpps.2016v8i10.13957

INTRODUCTION

Indole derivatives have been found to possess a wide range of biological activities. Many indole derivatives were reported as antimicrobial agents in several studies, among them, ethyl-3-indolylacrylate, and 5-bromo-3-(2-cyanovinyl) indole and 3(2-nitrovinyl)-indole were found to be active against a wide variety of pathogenic microorganisms [1]. Literature study revealed that halo indole was also found highly active [2], some other indole derivatives such as 3-acyl-4, 7-dihydroxy indoles possess antibacterial properties against Escherichia coli and Streptococcus pyogenes [3]. 1-morpholino-3-carbethoxy-5-hydroxy-2-methylindole was reported to be highly active against Escherichia coli and Bacillus cirroflagellosu [4] and 1-(4-phenyl), and (1-naphthyl-4H-1, 2, 4-triazole-5-thion-3-yl) indole exhibited strong antibacterial and antifungal activities [5].

Based on the above reports, we explored the synthesis of new indole propanamide derivatives 5(a–e) to be potent antibacterial and antifungal agents when tested against precarious pathogenic microorganisms such as Pseudomonas aureginosa, Escherichia coli, Vibrio cholerae, Staphylococcus aureus and antifungal activity against Candida albicans, Aspergillus niger, Penicillin chrysogenum and Cladosporium oxysporum. The rationality in investigating the biopotency of indole-3-propanamide derivatives is due to its use as precursors to obtain several biologically active molecules, especially for the treatment of brain disorder [6], as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, inhibitors of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor [7], immunosuppressive activity [8] anti-allergic [9] and inflammation inhibitors [10]. Thus, indole-3-propanamides have become an important precursor for various pharmaceutically important compounds [11-13], and there is flexibility in exploring indole-3-propanamide derivatives randomly for various biological activities to get suitable hits.

The synthesized compound 5(a-e) was subjected for in silico ADMET properties to predict the pharmacological actions such as aqueous solubility (PlogS), blood-brain barrier penetration (QPlogBB), intestinal absorption (logHIA), hepatotoxicity, Caco-2 cell permeability (QPPCaco) which helps to understand drug metabolism studies of the molecules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The chemicals and reagents were obtained from Sd-Fine, Hi-Media India, Sigma-Aldrich chemical company and were used as received. Melting points were determined in open capillary and are uncorrected. The purity of the compounds was checked by TLC using precoated silica gel plates procured from Merck. Further the synthesized compounds were purified by column chromatography using silica gel (60-120 mesh). FTIR was recorded (400–4000 cm^-1) using a KBr pellet method on the Shimadzu-8400S spectrometer; ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker supercon FT NMR (400 MHz) spectrometer in CDCl₃ using TMS as an internal standard. The chemical shifts are expressed in δ units. Mass spectral data were obtained on a JEOL SX 102/DA-6000 (10 KV) FAB mass spectrometer.

Synthesis of (E)-2-(1H-indol-3-yl) ethenamine (3)

An equimolar mixture of indole-3-carbaldehyde (1) (0.8 mol) and nitromethane (2) (1 mol) in acetic acid with ammonium chloride base was refluxed for 6-7 h at 70-80 °C. After completion of the reaction, the mixture was neutralized with sodium bicarbonate; the product obtained was isolated from ethyl acetate solvent. The product obtained after evaporation was purified by column chromatography using silica gel (60-120 mesh, mobile phase petroleum ether: ethyl acetate, 9:1 v/v) as an adsorbent to get the pure (E)-2-(1H-indol-3-yl) ethenamine (3).

Synthesis of (E)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-ylamino) vinyl)-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenyl propanamide derivatives (5a)

Substituted Meldrum's adduct [14] (4) (1 mol) and (E)-2-(1H-indol-3-yl) methenamine 3 (1 mol) were accurately mixed together in 5 ml pyridine and was refluxed 4-6 h at 80 °C. The progress of the reaction was monitored by using pre-coated silica gel plates (Merck). After completion, the product obtained was treated with copper sulphate solution and extracted using ethyl acetate. The crude product isolated was purified by column chromatography using silica gel (60-120 mesh, mobile phase petroleum ether: ethyl acetate 9:1 v/v) to get the pure (E)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl-amino) vinyl)-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanamide (5a). Similarly, other derivatives 5(b-e) were prepared by adopting the same procedure mentioned above.

Spectral data

(E)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl) vinyl)-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanamide (5a)

¹H-NMR(400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 2.97 (d d, J = 6.88, 13.44 Hz, 1H), 3.06 (d d, J = 7.56, 13.44 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 3.76 (q, J = 6.96 Hz, 1H), 4.81 (d, J = 11.12 Hz, 1H), 6.98-6.99 (m, 2H), 7.11 (t, J = 8.24 Hz, 5H), 7.19 (t, J = 7.04 Hz, 2H), 7.26 (t, J = 8.08 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (t, J = 7.24 Hz, 2H), 7.62 (s, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 38.00 Hz, 1H), 8.56 (s, 1H), 9.65 (s, 1H), 10.90 (s, 1H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 39.38, 39.59, 39.80, 40.01, 40.63, 41.76, 42.70, 58.00, 110.09, 112.03, 116.72, 117.88, 118.74, 119.45, 121.43, 123.13, 126.89, 127.17, 128.45, 129.48, 130.74, 133.39, 137.20, 138.00, 140.79, 141.04, 171.00 ppm; IR (KBr: ν_max/cm): 3,356(N-H), 3,109(C-H), 2,995(C-C), 1,564(C=C), 1,678(C=O), 1,295(C-N); MS: m/z = 420.30.

(E)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl) vinyl)-3-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3yl) phenylpropanamide (5b)

¹H-NMR(400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 2.97 (d d, J = 6.76, 13.40 Hz, 1H), 3.06 (d d, J = 7.56, 13.44 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 3.76 (q, J = 6.92 Hz, 1H), 4.88 (d, J = 7.56 Hz, 1H), 6.98-6.99 (m, 2H), 7.11 (t, J = 8.12 Hz, 5H), 7.19 (t, J = 7.04 Hz, 2H), 7.26 (t, J = 8.08 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (d, J = 7.24 Hz, 2H), 7.49 (d, J = 104.48 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 38.04 Hz, 1H), 8.57 (s, 1H), 9.67 (s, 1H), 10.81 (s, 1H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 39.36, 39.57, 39.78, 40.63, 41.79, 42.72, 58.07, 110.00, 112.04, 116.73, 117.89, 118.75, 119.46, 121.42, 123.14, 126.89, 127.18, 128.46, 129.48, 130.74, 137.23, 138.00, 140.79, 141.07, 171.03 ppm; IR (KBr: ν_max/cm): 3,350(N-H), 2,975(C-C), 1,536(C=C), 1,650(C=O), 1,247(C-N), 853(C-Cl); MS: m/z = 456.87(m+2).

(E)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl) vinyl)-3-(4-bromophenyl)-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3yl) phenylpropanamide (5c)

¹H-NMR(400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 2.97 (d d, J = 6.76, 13.36 Hz, 1H), 3.07 (d d, J = 7.72, 13.40 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 3.76 (q, J = 7.08 Hz, 1H), 4.83 (d, J = 4.28 Hz, 1H), 6.98-6.99 (m, 2H), 7.11 (t, J = 7.88 Hz, 5H), 7.19 (t, J = 7.40 Hz, 2H), 7.26 (t, J = 7.80 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (d, J = 7.28 Hz, 2H), 7.49 (d, J = 104.64 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 37.92 Hz, 1H), 8.37 (s, 1H), 9.56 (s, 1H), 10.00 (s, 1H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 41.79, 42.75, 58.04, 110.05, 112.07, 116.73, 117.89, 118.72, 119.46, 121.42, 123.18, 126.89, 127.14, 128.39, 129.57, 130.79, 133.36, 137.23, 138.00, 140.70, 141.07, 171.08 ppm; IR (KBr: ν_max/cm): 3,364(N-H), 3,109(C-H), 2,992(C-C), 1,584(C=C), 1,674(C=O), 764(C-Br); MS: m/z = 501.26(m+2).

(E)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl) vinyl)-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3yl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl) phenylpropanamide (5d)

¹H-NMR(400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 2.97 (d d, J = 6.88, 13.32 Hz, 1H), 3.07 (d d, J = 7.56, 13.60 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 3.76 (q, J = 6.44 Hz, 1H), 4.88 (d d, J = 7.52, Hz, 1H), 6.98-6.99 (m, 5H), 7.11 (t, J = 8.28 Hz, 2H), 7.19 (t, J = 7.28 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (t, J = 8.08 Hz, 2H), 7.33 (d, J = 7.28 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (d, J = 104.60 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 38.04 Hz, 2H), 8.52 (d, J =-236.08 Hz, 1H), 8.52 (s, 1H), 9.67 (s, 1H), 10.05 (s, 1H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 32.26, 39.89, 41.04, 42.00, 110.59, 116.80, 117.01, 118.22, 119.63, 121.76, 123.13, 126.75, 127.38, 128.59, 129.80, 130.01, 133.22, 137.43, 140.63, 141.76, 171.70 ppm; IR (KBr: ν_max/cm): 3,358(N-H), 2,931(C-C), 3,088(C-H), 1,536(C=C), 1,649(C=O), 1,297(C-N), 1,536(C-No₂); MS: m/z = 465.52.

(E)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl) vinyl)-3-(4-aminophenyl)-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3yl) phenylpropanamide (5e)

¹H-NMR(400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 2.97 (d d, J = 6.88, 13.44 Hz, 1H), 3.06 (d d, J = 7.56, 13.44 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 3.76 (q, J = 6.72 Hz, 1H), 3.08 (d, J = 7.64 Hz, 1H), 6.98-6.99 (m, 2H), 7.11 (t, J = 8.24 Hz, 5H), 7.19 (t, J = 7.04 Hz, 2H), 7.26 (t, J = 8.08 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (d, J = 7.24 Hz, 2H), 7.49 (d, J = 104.64 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 38.00 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (s, 1H), 3.67 (s, 1H), 10.05 (s, 1H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 32.75, 39.09, 41.76, 42.70, 110.09, 116.72, 117.88, 118.74, 119.45, 121.43, 123.13, 126.89, 127.17, 128.45, 129.48, 130.74, 133.39, 137.20, 140.79, 141.04, 171.00 ppm; IR (KBr: ν_max/cm): 3,351(N-H), 2,989(C-H), 2,931(C-C), 1,647(C=O), 1,556(C=C), 1,297(C-N); MS: m/z = 435.23.

Antimicrobial screening

Antibacterial study

The antibacterial activity of the title compounds were evaluated by cup-plate method using four different bacterial strains viz. Staphylococcus aureus, Vibrio cholerae, Pseudomonas auriginosa, and Escherichia coli (Bacterial species were obtained from Microbiology Department, Kuvempu University, Jnana Sahyadri, Shankarghatta, Shimoga) using nutrient agar (NA) medium A. The test solutions were prepared in DMSO and diluted using double distilled water to get concentrations of 1000, 500 and 250μg/ml. The test microorganisms maintained in slant tubes as solid culture. At first, the solid slants were inoculated from the original stock culture and finally the liquid media was inoculated from the solid slants. The microbes were allowed to incubate for 24 h at 37 °C. 20 ml of liquid agar media was taken in McCartney bottle and sterilized in autoclave at 121 °C for 15 min at 15 psi.

The sterilized media was then poured into sterilised petri plates aseptically in a horizontal laminar air flow chamber. The layers of media were uniformly distributed and were allowed to solidify in the aseptic chamber, followed by inoculating the bacterial strains separately in the petri plates. The spore suspension was adjusted with sterile saline to a concentration of approximately 1.0×10⁷ CFU/ml. In order to determine the antibacterial activity, the inoculated petri plates were divided into three quarters and to each quarter a well was made in the media with the help of a sterilized cork borer (9 mm). The known concentrations of the standard drug amoxicillin and the test compounds were added to the respective labelled wells. Thus, applied plates were then kept in refrigerator for 10 min. followed by incubation for 24 h at 37 °C [15-17].

Antifungal study

The antifungal activity of the synthesized compounds evaluated by cup-plate method using potato dextrose agar medium B (glucose 4%, peptone 1%, agar 2% and distilled water 1000 ml) with a pH 5.4. Four different fungal strains used in this process were Candida albicans, Aspergillus niger, Penicillin chrysogenum and Cladosporium oxysporum (Fungal species were obtained from Microbiology Department, Kuvempu University, Jnana Sahyadri, Shankarghatta, Shimoga). Three different concentrations of test sample solutions were prepared using DMSO and dilute with distilled water at the strength of 1000, 500 and 250μg/ml. The test microorganisms were maintained in slant tubes as solid culture and in test tube (containing 2.5 ml of media). First the solid slants were inoculated from the original stock culture and finally the liquid media were inoculated from the solid slants. The microbes were allowed to incubate for 24 h at a temperature of 28 °C. 20 ml of liquid agar media was taken in McCartney bottle and sterilized in autoclave at 121 °C for 15 min at 15 psi.

The sterilized media was poured into petri plates in aseptic condition. The layers of media were made uniform; the media was allowed to solidify followed by inoculating the fungal strains separately in the petri plates. The spore suspension was adjusted with sterile saline to a concentration of approximately 1.0×10⁷ in a final volume of 20 µl per well. Antifungal activity was determined by cup-plate method. For this purpose the inoculated petri plates were divided into three quarters and to each quarter a well was made in the media with the help of a sterilised cork borer (9 mm). The known concentrations of the standard drug and the test compounds were added to the wells so that the volume fills up the well uniformly. Thus applied plates were then kept in refrigerator for 10 min, followed by incubation for 72 h at 28 °C [15-17].

In silico ADME-toxicity prediction

The synthesized molecules were subjected for in silico ADMET parameters to predict the physicochemical properties and optimize using QSAR parameters. The QSAR properties of the compounds significantly help to understand pharmacokinetics behavior and to predict possible biological activity such as absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET). The ADMET QSAR [18] help to evaluate biologically active molecules and eliminate the biologically poor molecules containing undesirable functional groups based on Lipinski rule and further statistical calculation of the molecules help to understand biological behavior of the synthesized molecules. The ADMET study was carried by ACD/I-Lab-2.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In this work series of (E)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl-amino) vinyl)-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanamide derivatives 5(a-e) were synthesized, allowed for in vitro antimicrobial screening against precarious pathogenic microorganisms viz, Pseudomonas aureginosa, Escherichia coli, Vibrio cholerae, Staphylococcus aureus and antifungal activity against Candida albicans, Aspergillus niger, Penicillin chrysogenum and Cladosporium oxysporum strains. There are several therapeutic options now exist to cure infectious diseases, but due to their poor response rate, adverse effects and the development of resistant mutants highlights the need for new alternative drugs, which are most specificity in their mechanism of action while used as therapeutic agents.

In this regard, indole derivatives have exhibited antimicrobial activity [1]; Hence serendipity way of identification of new leads that can play an important role to discover new drug molecules. Among the series of synthesized compounds 5c, 5d and 5e were potent against both bacterial as well as fungal strains. These results were correlated with ADMET parameters, gives reliable efficacy in all physiological properties; it is due to the presence of electron withdrawing (chlorine, bromine, nitro) and donating groups (amine) on aryl ring.

The incorporation of halogen substituent into lead analogues to improve the lipophilic nature, the lipophilicity of the derivatives it is due to the presence of chlorine, bromine, nitro and amine functionalities. The chlorine, bromine and nitro groups are electron withdrawing; the amine functionalities are involved intra molecular hydrogen bonding, this increases the non-polar property of the lead analogues; it helps to easy penetration of the drug into the lipid membranes. The chemical reactivity of halogen atoms depends on their position of attachment to the lead and nature of the halogen. Compound 5a was synthesized without substitution and is necessary to compare the substitution effect on the aryl ring. The replacement of a hydrogen atom in an active molecule by a substitute (halogen, nitro and amino) can modify the potency, duration of action and the nature of the pharmacological effect [24].

The substitutes can affect various parameters of a drug molecule, such as partition coefficient, electronic density, steric environment, bioavailability, pharmacokinetics and ability to establish direct interactions between the substituent and the receptor or the enzyme; the compounds rich in electron density are exerted mesomeric effect, which are able to soluble in lipids, the lipid solubility is directly proportional to efficacy and their by pharmacological effect, it might be involved in the inhibition of cell wall synthesis.

Antimicrobial activity

The compounds 5(a-e) were tested for in vitro antimicrobial activity against Pseudomonas aureginosa, Escherichia coli, Vibrio cholerae, Staphylococcus aureus using amoxicillin as a standard and for their antifungal activity against Candida albicans, Aspergillus niger, Penicillin chrysogenum and Cladosporium oxysporum using flucanazole as standard.

The compounds were dissolved in DMSO at three different concentrations 1000, 500 and 250 μg/ml. The inhibition values of the compounds were determined by the twofold serial dilution technique using nutrient agar medium A and Potato dextrose agar for bacteria and fungi, respectively. Table 1 and table 2 represent the results of the in vitro activity determined by the cup plate method [15]. The antimicrobial result reveals that the compound 5a, 5b showed moderate activity at 1000 μg/ml against Pseudomonas auriginosa Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, 5c, 5d and 5e are potent at (250 and 1000 μg/ml) against Pseudomonas auriginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli respectively, when compares to standard amoxicillin. The compounds 5a, 5b, 5d and 5e showed moderate activity against Cladosporium oxysporum, Penicillin chrysogenum and Candida albicans, 5c reveals good activity at 250μg/ml as compared to rest of the test samples with flucanazole. In general, the compound 5c exhibit potent antimicrobial activity.

N-substituted indole with halogen functions of the aryl ring at 3-position enhances the antimicrobial activity. Some simple indole derivatives with mixed antifungal and antibacterial activities were converted by Whitehead and Whitesitt (1974) to antibacterial compounds by introducing an appropriate diarylmethyl substituent. These investigators also increased the antifungal activity of 5-bromoindole 2 to 25 times by adding the diphenylmethyl group to the 3-position. The compound 5-bromoindole inhibited six of the fungal species and was considered as an effective antifungal agent of the simple indoles. Inspired by these studies, insertion of a halogen-substituted aromatic ring 3-position of indole especially with bromine exhibited good activity.

Table 1: The antibacterial potential of (E)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-ylamino) vinyl)-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanamide and its derivatives 5(a-e)

Compound	Conc. of test sample (µg/ml)	Zone of inhibition in mm (mean±SD) n=3
Compound	Conc. of test sample (µg/ml)	PA	SA	VC	EC
5a	1000 500 250	18±0.20 16±0.20 15±0.10	15±0.10 14±0.10 14±0.10	00 00 00	16±0.20 15±0.10 15±0.20
5b	1000 500 250	18±0.20 14±0.10 12±0.10	17±0.10 16±0.10 16±0.20	17±0.20 13±0.10 12±0.10	22±0.10 18±0.10 18±0.10
5c	1000 500 250	24±0.10 21±0.20 20±0.10	22±0.20 20±0.10 20±0.20	22±0.20 18±0.20 14±0.20	22±0.20 18±0.20 16±0.10
5d	1000 500 250	22±0.30 19±0.20 15±0.20	22±0.10 17±0.20 13±0.20	21±0.20 19±0.10 13±0.10	20±0.20 16±0.20 12±0.10
5e	1000 500 250	22±0.20 19±0.30 15±0.10	20±0.10 17±0.30 10±0.20	21±0.10 19±0.30 13±0.20	20±0.30 16±0.20 12±0.20
Standard (Amoxicillin)	1 mg/ml	32±0.20	26±0.20	28±0.10	34±0.20

PA: Pseudomonas auriginosa, SA: Staphylococcus aureus, VC: Vibrio cholera, EC: Escherichia coli, Standard: Amoxicillin, Bore Size: 9 mm, SD: Standard deviation.

Table 2: The antifungal potential of (E)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-ylamino) vinyl)-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanamide and its derivatives 5(a-e)

Compound	Conc. of test sample (µg/ml)	Zone of inhibition in mm (mean±SD) n=3
Compound	Conc. of test sample (µg/ml)	CO	PC	CA	AN
5a	1000 500 250	16±0.20 08±0.30 00	10±0.30 00 00	18±0.30 10±0.20 00	00 00 00
5b	1000 500 250	18±0.40 10±0.30 04±0.20	12±0.30 08±0.20 08±0.20	18±0.30 12±0.30 08±0.20	00 00 00
5c	1000 500 250	22±0.20 18±0.30 16±0.30	26±0.20 20±0.30 17±0.40	20±0.20 12±0.20 08±0.40	12±0.30 08±0.50 00
5d	1000 500 250	14±0.20 10±0.30 10±0.20	12±0.30 08±0.40 00	14±0.40 10±0.50 00	00 00 00
5e	1000 500 250	18±0.20 14±0.20 10±0.20	12±0.20 10±0.20 08±0.40	18±0.40 12±0.30 08±0.30	00 00 00
Standard (Flucanazole)	1 mg/ml	28±0.30	32±0.20	24±0.20	20±0.40

CO: Cladosporium oxysporum, PC: Penicillin chrysogenum, CA: Candida albicans, AN: Aspergillus niger, Standard: Flucanazole, Bore Size: 9 mm, SD: Standard deviation.

In silico ADME-toxicity prediction

The QSAR properties of the compounds significantly help to understand pharmacokinetics behavior to predict possible biological activity such as absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET). The ADMET QSAR [18] help to evaluate biological active molecules and eliminate the biologically poor molecules containing undesirable functional groups based on Lipinski rule.

The in silico results revealed that molecules have moderate effect on reliability index and LD50 dose [19] on different routes of drug administration is found to be safe enough. The compounds were found to be good with P log BB, log HIA, P Caco, GI, log PGI poor P log S and solubility and greater membrane permeability aqueous solubility (P log S), blood-brain barrier penetration (Q P log BB), intestinal absorption (log HIA) [20, 21] Hepato toxicity, Caco-2 cell permeability (QPP Caco) also help to understand drug metabolism studies of the molecules [22]. To predict the toxicity of lead molecules with intra peritoneal, oral, intravenous and subcutaneous toxic effects of blood, cardiovascular system, gastrointestinal, kidney, liver and lungs to calculate sensitivity, specificity and area under the curves (AUC) that predicts the linearity of compounds [23].

The absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion, parameters influence the drug levels and kinetics of drug exposure to the tissues and perform the pharmacological activity of the compounds as a drug. According to in silico ADME analysis, the resulting compounds showed good blood/brain barrier partition coefficient power with PlogBB value and good cell permeability value of nearly 1 with PCaco, good intestinal absorption properties with log HIA value 1 of the compound 5e, good glycoprotein substrates and glycoprotein inhibitors (0.8-1.0), the compounds showed moderate aqueous soluble property with better LD50 and drug reliability index. The pharmacokinetic parameters help to further explore the molecules on to other parameters of drug discovery and minimise the time in the drug development process.

Table 3: ADME and pharmacological parameters prediction for the ligands (E)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl-amino) vinyl)-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanamide derivatives 5(a-e) using ADMET SAR toolbox

Ligand	PlogBB^a	log_HIA^c	P Caco^b	logpGI (substrate)^d	logPGI (non-inhibitor)^e	PlogS^f	logpapp^g
5a	0.9785	0.9970	0.5334	0.5051	0.5911	-3.5569	0.9480
5b	0.9782	0.9975	0.5000	0.5050	0.6641	-4.2428	0.8702
5c	0.9541	0.9953	0.5465	0.5105	0.7480	-3.7250	0.8485
5d	0.9836	0.9945	0.5292	0.5402	0.6834	-3.6698	0.8505
5e	0.9773	0.9963	0.5204	0.5062	0.5507	-4.1127	0.8307
Indomethacin	0.9381	0.9509	0.5857	0.6360	0.9313	-4.6825	0.6287
Camptothecin	0.6345	0.8410	0.5555	0.6039	0.7852	-3.0369	1.1839
Tetracycline	0.9841	0.8006	0.7439	0.7910	0.8025	-3.0575	0.7655
Tretinoin	0.9311	0.9925	0.7603	0.6144	0.8912	-3.0895	1.7734
Levostatin	0.9287	0.9452	0.5484	0.7861	0.7046	-5.9475	0.8127
Metronidazole	0.9297	0.9805	0.5365	0.5141	0.8954	-1.3229	0.8033

^aPredicted blood/brain barrier partition coefficient (1-high penetration, 2-medium penetration and 3-Low penetration), ^bPredicted Caco-2 cell permeability in nm/s (acceptable range: -1 is poor, 1is great), ^cPredicted Human intestinal absorption in nm/s (acceptable range: 0 poor,>1 great), ^dPredicted P-glycoprotein substrate in nm/s (acceptable range of-5 is poor, 1 is great), ^ePredicted P-glycoprotein inhibitor in nm/s (accepted range: 0 to 1), ^fPredicted aqueous solubility, (Concern value is 0-2 highly soluble), ^gPredicted probability of Caco-2 cell permeability in cm/s (Concern value is-1 to 1).

Table 4: LD₅₀and probability of health effects of (E)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl-amino) vinyl)-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanamide derivatives 5(a-e) using ACD/I-Lab 2.0

ADME-TOX Paramet-ers	Intraperitoneal a	Oral a	Intra -venous a	Subcutaneous a	Blood Effect b	Cardiovascr system effect b	Gastro intestnal effect b	Kidney effect b	Liver effect b	Lung effect b
5a	180(0.32)	780(0.35)	20(0.29)	230(0.43)	0.95	0.95	0.65	0.75	0.03	0.97
5b	210(0.32)	920(0.43)	20(0.31)	210(0.42)	0.96	0.99	0.66	0.82	0.94	0.97
5c	290(0.33)	850(0.42)	19(0.35)	250(0.4)	0.96	0.99	0.98	0.92	0.93	0.98
5d	150(0.3)	920(0.37)	16(0.36)	200(0.36)	0.93	0.95	0.91	0.81	0.95	0.99
5e	190(0.32)	840(0.36)	21(0.32)	190(0.16)	0.94	0.96	0.94	0.85	0.94	0.97

^aEstimated LD₅₀-mouse value in mg/kg after intra peritoneal, oral, intravenous and subcutaneous administration, ^bEstimated probability of blood, gastrointestinal system, kidney, liver and lung effect at therapeutic dose range of compounds, The drugs with moderate effect on reliability index (>0.5), The drugs with border line effect on reliability index (>0.3,<0.5).

R = H, Cl, NO₂, NH₂, Br

Scheme: Synthesis of (E)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl-amino) vinyl)-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanamide derivatives 5(a-e)

Table 5: Physical properties of synthesis of (E)-N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl-amino) vinyl)-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanamide derivatives 5(a-e)

Entry	Products	M. P ( °C)	Yield(%)^a
5a		103-105	84
5b		117-119	89
5c		220-223	73
5d		126-128	78
5e		119-121	69

CONCLUSION

The results revealed that compounds 5b, 5c, 5d and 5e showed good antimicrobial potential and were obeying the in silico pharmacokinetic parameters. In case of compound 5e less activity was observed against fungus than 5c. The encouraging results exhibited by the title compounds 5(a-e), can be explored as lead molecules in antimicrobial therapy.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The author Manjunatha K. S. thanks the OBC Cell and authorities of Kuvempu University for providing student fellowship. The author thanks to the department of microbiology, Kuvempu University, Shankarghatta for providing microbial strains. The author also thankful to IISc Bangalore for providing spectral data.

CONFLICT OF INTTERESTS

No conflicts of interest

REFERENCES

Mehta DS, Sikotra KH, Shah VH. Synthesis and biological screening of some novel indole derivatives. Indian J Chem 2005; 44B:2590-7.
Whitehead CW, Whitesitt AA. Effects of lipophilic substituents on some biological properties of indoles. J Med Chem 1974;17:1298-304.
Malesani G, Chiarelotto G, Dallacqua F, Vedali D. Antimicrobial properties of some 3-acyl-4, 7-disubstituted indoles. Farmaco 1975;30:137-46.
Donawade DS, Gadaginamath GS. Some electrophilic substitution reactions on 1-substituted-3-acetyl/carbethoxy-5-hydroxy-2-methylindole and antimicrobial activity of these new indole derivatives. Indian J Chem 2005;44B:1679-85.
Tsotinis A, Varvaresou A, Calogeropoulou T, Siatra-Papastaikoudi T, Tiligada A. Synthesis and antimicrobial evaluation of indole containing derivatives of 1,3,4-triazole and their open-chain counterparts. Arzneim-Forsch/Drug Res 1997;47:307-10.
Cooper LC, Chicchi GG, Dinnell K, Elliott JM, Hollingworth GJ, Kurtz MM, et al. 2-Aryl Indole Nk1 receptor antagonists: optimization of indole substitution. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2001;11:1233-6.
Andrew MT, David WF, Alan JK, William AD. Synthesis of 2,2’-dithiobis(1H-indole-3-alkanamides) and investigation of their inhibitory activity against epidermal growth factor receptor and pp600-src protein tyrosine kinases. J Med Chem 1994;37:598-609.
Francis G, Pascal M, Delphine C, Michael S, François L, Muriel D. Synthesis of N-aryl-3-(indol-3-yl)propanamides and their immunosuppressive activities. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2010; 20:5203-6.
Jacobs RT, Brown FJ, Cronk LA, Aharony D, Buckner CK, Kusner EJ, et al. Substituted 3-(phenylmethyl)-1H-indole-5-carboxa-mides and 1-(phenylmethyl)indole-6-carboxamides as potent, selective, orally active antagonists of the peptidoleukotrienes. J Med Chem 1993;36:394-409.
Duflos M, Nourrsson MR, Brelet J, Courant J, LeBaut B, Brimaud N, et al. N-Pyridinyl-indole-3-(alkyl)carboxamides and derivatives as potential systemic and topical inflammation inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem 2001;36:545-53.
Dardennes E, Gerard S, Petermann C, Sapi J. Diastereoselective trimolecular condensation between indole, Meldrum’s acid and chiral sugar-derived aldehydes. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2010;21:208-15.
Dardennes E, Kulyassa AK, Boisbrun M, Petermann C, Laronze JY, Sapi J. Diastereocontrolled multicomponent pathway to 3,4-heterocycle-annulated tetrahydro-carbolines. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2005;16:1329-39.
Cochard F, Laronze M, Sigaut P, Sapi J, Laronze JY. Synthesis of carbazoles by a lanced four component condensation. Tetrahedron Lett 2004;45:1703-7.
Siddalingamurthy E, Mahadevan KM, Shrungesh Kumar TO. Choline chloride/Urea ionic liquid catalyzed a convenient one-pot synthesis of indole-3-propanamide derivatives. Synth Commun 2013;43:3153-62.
Saundane AR, Rudresh K, Satyanarayan ND, Hiremath SP. Pharmacological screening of 6H, 11H-indole[3,2-c]isoquinolin-5-ones and their derivatives. Indian J Pharm Sci 1998;6:379-83.
Laxmi S, Ankit J, Upendra B. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of some novel schiff base derivatives of 5-nitro isatin. Asian J Pharm Life Sci 2011;1 Suppl 3:2231-4423.
Bhovi MG, Gadaginamath GS. 1, 3-Dipolar cycloaddition reactions: Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of novel 1-triazolylindole and 1-triazolylbenz-[g]indole derivatives. Indian J Chem 2005;44B:1068-73.
Feixiong C, Weihua L, Yadi Z, Jie S, Zengrui W, Guixia L, et al. Admetsar: a comprehensive source and free tool for assessment of chemical ADMET properties. J Chem Inf Model 2012;52:3099-105.
Jagadeesh NM, Mahadevan KM, Kumara MN, Prashantha N. Synthesis and molecular docking study of N-alkyl/aryl-2-aryl indol-3-yl glyoxylamides as novel anticancer agents. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2014;6:921-6.
Manjunatha KS, Manjulatha K, Satyanarayan ND, Kaviraj MY, Adarsha HJ. Anti-proliferative and ADMET screening of novel 3-(1H-indol-3-yl)-1, 3-diphenylpropan-1-one derivatives. Cogent Chem 2016;2:1-11.
Lin JH, Yamazaki M. Role of P-glycoprotein in pharmacokinetics: clinical implications. Clin Pharmacokinet 2003;42:59-98.
David L, Olivier S, Hervé G, Maria AM, Bruno OV. FAF-drugs 2: free ADME/tox filtering tool to assist drug discovery and chemical biology projects. BMC Bioinf 2008;9:396.
Siddalingamurthy E, Mahadevan KM, Jagadeesh NM, Kumara MN. Synthesis and docking study of 3-(N-alkyl/aryl piperidyl) indoles with serotonin-5HT, H1 and CCR2 antihistamine receptors. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2014;6:475-82.
Olgena S, Altanlarb N, Karataylıc E, Bozdayıc M. Antimicrobial and antiviral screening of novel indole carboxamide and propanamide derivatives Z. Naturforsch 2008;63c:189-95.

How to cite this article

KS Manjunatha, ND Satyanarayan, S Harishkumar. Antimicrobial and in silico admet screening of novel (e)-n-(2-(1h-indol-3-yl-amino) vinyl)-3-(1-methyl-1h-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanamide derivatives. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2016;8(10):251-256.