A STUDY ON MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING FISTULOGRAM EVALUATION OF PERIANAL DISCHARGE IN AN INDIAN POPULATION

Authors

  • Santosh Kumar Panda Department of Radiodiagnosis, Pandit Raghunath Murmu Medical College, Baripada, Odisha, India
  • Madhuri Panigrahi Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i5.24655

Keywords:

Magnetic resonance imaging, Fistula, Anal sphincter

Abstract

 Objective: Pre-operative assessment of perianal fistulas is very important for best planning of surgery and prevention of relapse. The goal of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of perianal discharge is to demonstrate accurately the anatomy of the perianal region. MRI can clearly show the relationship of fistulas to the anal sphincter complex, levator plate, and the ischiorectal/ischioanal fossa. The aim of the study was to find out the various types of fistula and compare MRI fistulogram with surgery findings.

Methods: In the present study, 38 number of patients were included who were sent for pre-operative MRI evaluation of perianal discharge and their post-operative data were collected for analysis. Surgical grading was according to Park's surgical classification. Fistulas were graded in MRI according to St James's University Hospital MRI classification of perianal fistulas.

Results: It was found from the study that most of the patients were adults (35/38), whereas one was a child and one was adolescent. Almost all were male (36/38) except two were female. Around 50% of patients had previous history of surgery and had come for persistent/recurrent lesion. According to MRI, all except one had true fistula, rest one had sinus, and one had ischioanal abscess. Percentage of Grade I, Grade II, Grade III, and Grade IV fistula were 31.58, 13.16, 15.79, and 34.21, respectively. Percentage of intersphincteric (I and II) type was 44.74 (17 in no) and transsphincteric (III and IV) was 55.26 (21 in no.), and supra- and extra-sphincteric type was 0 in number. Most had internal anal canal opening posterior to transverse anal line, out of which most were around 6 o'clock position. MRI successfully described fistula tract in all except for two cases (36/38).

Conclusion: MRI is very accurate in pre-operative evaluation and planning for surgery of perianal fistulas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Goodsall DH, Miles WE. Diseases of the Anus and Rectum. London, England: Longmans, Green; 1900.

Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 1976;63:1-12.

Morris J, Spencer JA, Ambrose NS. MR imaging classification of perianal fistulas and its implications for patient management. Radiographics 2000;20:623-35.

Halligan S, Stoker J. Imaging of fistula in Ano. Radiology 2006;239:18-33.

De Miguel Criado J, Del Salto LG, Rivas PF, del Hoyo LF, Velasco LG, de Las Vacas MI, et al. MR imaging evaluation of perianal fistulas: Spectrum of imaging features. Radiographics 2012;32:175-94.

Hwang JY, Yoon HK, Kim WK, Cho YA, Lee JS, Yoon CH, et al. Transperineal ultrasonography for evaluation of the perianal fistula and abscess in pediatric Crohn disease. Ultrasonography 2014;33:184-90.

Visscher AP, Felt-Bersma RJ. Endoanal ultrasound in perianal fistulae and abscesses. Ultrasound Q 2015;31 (2): 130-137.

Thalakotunage AH, Sethaput T. Quantification of CSF velocity through the narrowest point in the aqueduct of Sylvia for normal and normal pressure hydrocephalus patient by CFD analysis. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2016;8 Suppl 2:52.

Pathak KY, Mohanan A, Acharya S, Mandavia D, Jadhav HR. Exploring visceral adiposity index as a predictor of visceral adiposity dysfunction and evaluating its performance in predicting hepatic insulin resistance in Indian Type 2 diabetes. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2016;8:297-301.

Jaime de MC, Laura GS, Patricia FR, Luis FA, Leticia GV, Isabel DP, et al. MR imaging evaluation of perianal fistulas: Spectrum of imaging features. Radio Graph 2012;32:175-94.

Wu CL. Experience on the treatment of acute anorectal abscess with primary fistulotomy. Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi 1990;6:218-23.

Lunniss PJ, Jenkins PJ, Besser GM, Rerry LA, Phillips RK. Gender differences in incidence of idiopathic fistula-inano are not explained by circulating sex hormones. Int J Colorect Dis 1995;10:25-8.

Sainio P. Fistula-in-ano in a defined population. Incidence and epidemiological aspects. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1984;73:219-24.

Read DR, Abcarian H. A prospective survey of 474 patients with anorectal abscess. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:566-8.

Malouf AJ, Cadogan MD, Bartolo DC, Canal CA. In: Corson JD, Williamson RC, editors. Surgery. London: Mosby; 2001. p. 1-26.

Vasilevsky CA, Gordon PH. Results of treatment of fistula in ano. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;28:225-31.

Daabis N, El Shafey R, Zakaria Y, Elkhadrawy O. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of perianal fistula. Egypt J Radiol Nuclear Med 2013;44:705-11.

Ziech M, Felt-Bersma R, Stoker J. Imaging of perianal fistulas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7:1037-45.

Maier AG, Funovics MA, Kreuzer SH, Herbst F, Wunderlich M, Teleky BK, et al. Evaluation of perianal sepsis: Comparison of anal end sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:254-60.

Published

01-05-2018

How to Cite

Panda, S. K., and M. Panigrahi. “A STUDY ON MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING FISTULOGRAM EVALUATION OF PERIANAL DISCHARGE IN AN INDIAN POPULATION”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 11, no. 5, May 2018, pp. 284-9, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i5.24655.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)