COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ORAL HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENTS IN TYPE-2 DIABETES OBESE PATIENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i6.25264Keywords:
Type-2 Diabetes, Obesity Patients, oral hypoglycaemic AgentsAbstract
  Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of oral hypoglycemic agents in obese Type-2 diabetic patients. The objectives are to compare fasting and postprandial blood sugar (PPBS) levels, to compare body mass index (BMI) in all the groups, and to identify glycosylated hemoglobin levels and adverse drug reactions (if present) in all the groups.
Method: This is a prospective observational study conducted in care diabetic center over a period of 1 year. All the patients those are receiving only oral hypoglycemic agents continuously over a period of 3 months and BMI ≥30 were enrolled. The patients receiving insulin were excluded. Patients were followed over a period of 3 months and were reviewed on visit basis (every 30 days). All the necessary information was collected into the data collection form that includes demographic details (age, gender, etc.), past medication history, current treatment charts, and their relevant laboratory reports (fasting blood sugar levels [mg/dl], PPBS levels [mg/dl], glycosylated hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] (%), and BMI [kg/m2]).
  Results: A total of 395 patients were recruited into the study and the drugs received by the population were found to be metformin+sulfonylureas (33%), metformin+pioglitazone (26%), and metformin+dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitors (DPI) (23%). A significant reduction in HbA1c was seen in all groups of patients. Adverse drug reactions observed were hypoglycemia, pedal edema, and itching distributed to drugs metformin+DPI, respectively. A significant reduction in BMI was seen in patients receiving DPI and BMI was found to be increased in other groups of patients.
Conclusion: Overall, three classes of drugs were found to have similar efficacy. Sulfonylureas were commonly associated with hypoglycemia when compared to other drugs and weight reduction observed in dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitors.
Downloads
References
Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. DiabetesCare 2004;27:1047-53.
Hollander P. Anti-diabetes and anti-obesity medications: Effects on weight in people with diabetes. Diabetes Spectrum 2007;20:159-65.
Golay A, Ybarra J. Link between obesity and Type 2 diabetes. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;19:649-63.
Fonseca V. Effect of thiazolidinediones on body weight in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J Med 2003;115 Suppl 8A:42S-8.
Pravinkumar VI, Talele GS. Comparative effects of metformin in combination with glimepiride and glibenclamide on lipid profile in Indian patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2011;3:472-4.
Bonora E. Antidiabetic medications in overweight/obese patients with Type 2 diabetes: Drawbacks of current drugs and potential advantages of incretin-based treatment on body weight. Int J ClinPract Suppl 2007;154:19-28.
Gale EA, Gillespie KM. Diabetes and gender. Diabetologia 2001;44:3 15.
Green J, Feinglos M. New combination treatments in the management of diabetes: Focus on sitagliptin-metformin. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2008;4:743-51.
Michael J, Fowler MD. Diabetes treatment, part 2: Oral agents for glycemic management. Clin Diabetes 2007;25:131-4.
Zaki NM, Maghrabi I. Trends in therapeutic interventions in patients with diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2013;5:171-7.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
The publication is licensed under CC By and is open access. Copyright is with author and allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions.