PREVALENCE OF NEAR MISS AND MATERNAL DEATHS AND ITS MATERNAL AND PERINATAL OUTCOMES: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Authors

  • ANITA MADAN Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab.
  • PALLAVI SHARMA Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab.
  • JAGDEEP KAUR Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab.
  • ANISHA PURI Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Ambala, Haryana, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2021.v14i8.41893

Keywords:

Maternal near miss, Maternal mortality, Maternal near miss incidence ratio

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of the study was to determine maternal mortality ratio (MMR), maternal near miss incidence ratio (MNM IR), MNM to mortality ratio (MNM: MD), and mortality index (MI) and to know the prevalence, demographic distribution, causes and feto-maternal outcome of maternal near miss and maternal deaths.

Methods: A retrospective review of near miss and maternal mortality over a period of 20 months in a tertiary teaching hospital in Punjab.

Results: MMR was 998 MNM IR was 24.20/1000 live births. Maternal near miss mortality ratio was 2.4:1. MI was 29.21%. The most common cause of maternal mortality was hypertension, which was seen in 14 (53.84%) women. Among near miss cases, the most common complication noted was hemorrhage, seen in 40 (63.49%) cases. Among maternal deaths, 7 (26.92%) women delivered vaginally, 6 (23.07%) women underwent emergency cesarean section. Among near miss cases, 20 (31.74%) women delivered vaginally, 13 (20.63%) women underwent cesarean section while 7 (11.11%) had cesarean hysterectomy. Laparotomy for ruptured ectopic pregnancy was done in 6 (9.52%) women, 7 (11.11%) women had dilatation and evacuation, 3 (4.76%) had exploration of Uterovaginal canal. Preterm birth has seen in 8 (12.69%) in maternal deaths and 23(36.50%) in maternal near miss. Intrauterine fetal demise occurred in 4 (6.34%) in maternal deaths and 2 (4.87%) in near miss.

Conclusion: The review of near miss cases is important to identify response of health care system to medical emergencies and provides opportunities to improve the quality of service.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Say L, Souza JP, Pattinson RC; WHO Working Group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity Classifications. WHO working group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity Classifications. Maternal near miss-towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009;23:287-96.

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Matenal Near Miss Review Operational Guidelines. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India; 2014.

Sarma HK, Sarma HK, Kalita AK. A prospective study of maternal near miss and maternal mortality cases in FAAMCH, Barpeta; with special reference to its aetiology and management: First 4 months report. J Obstet Gynaecol Barpeta 2015;1:100-6.

Sultana S, Ishtiaque S, Fareed S, Kamal S, Aslam Z, Hussain R, et al. Clinical spectrum of near-miss cases in obstetrics. Cureus 2019;11:e4641.

Parmar NT, Parmar AG, Mazumdar VS. Incidence of maternal “near-miss” events in a tertiary care hospital of central Gujarat, India. J Obstet Gynecol India 2016;66:315-20.

Bansal M, Lagoo J, Pujari K. Study of near miss cases in obstetrics and maternal mortality in Bastar, Chattisgarh, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecaal 2016;5:620-3.

Oladapo OT, Sule-Odu AO, Olatunji AO, Daniel OJ. “Near-Miss” obstetric events and maternal deaths in Sagamu, Nigeria: A retrospective study. Reprod Health 2005;2:9.

Doreswamy N. Prevalance and outcome of maternal near miss in a tertiary care centre a cross sectional study at Hassan, Karnataka, India. Int J Clin Obestet Gynaecol 2020;4:209-12.

Published

07-08-2021

How to Cite

MADAN, A., P. SHARMA, J. KAUR, and A. PURI. “PREVALENCE OF NEAR MISS AND MATERNAL DEATHS AND ITS MATERNAL AND PERINATAL OUTCOMES: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 14, no. 8, Aug. 2021, pp. 62-65, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2021.v14i8.41893.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)