COMPARISON OF CONTINUATION OF POST-PLACENTAL INSERTION OF COPPER T AFTER CESAREAN SECTION AND NORMAL VAGINAL DELIVERY

Authors

  • Santosh Khajotia Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sardar Patel Medical College, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India.
  • Mohd Shakeel Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sardar Patel Medical College, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India.
  • Swati Kochar Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sardar Patel Medical College, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India.
  • Tanu Bano Department of Pathology, Sardar Patel Medical College, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i11.48232

Keywords:

PPIUCD, LSCS, Vaginal delivery

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of post-placental copper T insertion following vaginal and cesarean delivery.

Methods: This is a prospective study conducted for the period of 1 year on pregnant females undergoing deliveries at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sardar Patel Medical College and AGH, Bikaner. The total number of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device inserted participants included in the study were 200, divided into two groups vaginal (group A) and lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) (group B) groups.

Results: Mean age of the patients was 26.15±4.02 years. Most of the acceptors in both the groups were para-2 with 30% in vaginal group and 76% in LSCS group. The complaints at 6 weeks follow-up, in both groups, were similar, but the rate of removal was higher in vaginal group (9%) compared to LSCS group (2%). At 3 months follow-up, in vaginal group, the most common complaint was bleeding per vagina (PV) in 7.31% cases whereas missing thread 31.25% in LSCS group. Over a period of 3 months, the main reason for intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD) removal was bleeding PV in both group (six cases in vaginal group and three cases in LSCS group).

Conclusion: Immediate post-partum insertion of IUCD appears to be safe and effective method of contraception.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Santosh Khajotia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sardar Patel Medical College, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India.

Senior Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Mohd Shakeel, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sardar Patel Medical College, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India.

Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Swati Kochar, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sardar Patel Medical College, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India.

Senior Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Tanu Bano, Department of Pathology, Sardar Patel Medical College, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India.

Senior Resident, Department of Pathology

References

Maternal Health; 2021. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/india/ what-we-do/maternal-health [Last accessed on 2021 May 29].

Reference Manual, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi; 2010.

Reference Manual, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi; 2007.

Lall J, Nagar O. Comparative study of postplacental CU-T insertion in vaginal and caesarean deliveries. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 2019;234:e24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.08.204

World Health Organization. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use: A WHO Family Planning Cornerstone. 4th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. p. 3-4.

Grimes DA, Lopez LM, Schulz KF, Van Vliet HA, Stanwood NL. Immediate post-partum insertion of intrauterine devices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;5:CD003060. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD003036.pub2, PMID 20464722

Postpartum IUCD Reference Manual. New Delhi: Family Planning Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2010.

Kanwat B, Salodia L, Chauhan M, Rastogi R. Comparative study of post-partum intrauterine contraceptive device in vaginal and intra caesarean insertion. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2017;6:4938-4. doi: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175004

Tripathi U, Sahu D. Outcome of immediate postpartum insertion of IUCD-a prospective study. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res 2018; 5:511-5.

Mishra S. Evaluation of safety, efficacy, and expulsion of post-placental and intra-cesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD). J Obstet Gynaecol India 2014;64:337-43. doi: 10.1007/ s13224-014-0550-3. PMID 25368457, PMCID PMC4199427

Maluchuru S, Aruna V, Prabhavathi N. Post-partum-intrauterine device Insertion-2yr experience at a tertiary care center in Guntur medical college/Govt. general hospital, Guntur. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2015;14:56-61.

Chawla R, Ahuja R, Sharma P. Awareness of post partum intra uterine contraceptive device and reasons for its low acceptance in an urban Indian population. Int J Res Med Sci 2020;8:701-5. doi: 10.18203/2320- 6012.ijrms20200260

Soni M, Sharma V, Bhat MP, Sharma A. Post-placental postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices insertion: Our scenario. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2016;5:766-9. doi: 10.18203/2320-1770. ijrcog20160581

Halder A, Sowmya MS, Gayen A, Bhattacharya P, Mukherjee S, Datta S. A prospective study to evaluate vaginal insertion and intra-cesarean insertion of post-partum intrauterine contraceptive device. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2016;66:35-41. doi: 10.1007/s13224-014- 0640-2, PMID 26924905

Hooda R, Mann S, Nanda S, Gupta A, More H, Bhutani J. Immediate postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device insertions in caesarean and vaginal deliveries: A comparative study of follow-up outcomes. Int J Reprod Med 2016;2016:7695847. doi: 10.1155/2016/7695847, PMID 27631023

Published

07-11-2023

How to Cite

Khajotia, S., M. Shakeel, S. Kochar, and T. Bano. “COMPARISON OF CONTINUATION OF POST-PLACENTAL INSERTION OF COPPER T AFTER CESAREAN SECTION AND NORMAL VAGINAL DELIVERY”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 16, no. 11, Nov. 2023, pp. 41-44, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i11.48232.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)