QUALITY AND EFFICACY OF GENERAL ANESTHESIA VERSUS SEGMENTAL THORACIC SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN MODIFIED RADICAL MASTECTOMY SURGERY: A SINGLE-CENTER OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

Authors

  • NAMITA GUPTA Department of Anesthesiology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
  • SONIA AGARWAL Department of Pathology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
  • GAURAV GOYAL Department of anesthesiology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8006-034X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i1.48626

Keywords:

Keywords: modified radical mastectomy, spinal anaesthesia, general anaesthesia, anaesthesia recovery period, quality control, enhanced recovery after surgery.

Abstract

Objective: Surgical resection remains the most important treatment modality for breast cancers. Recent research suggests that the choice of anesthesia technique might also have a role in the recurrence of the disease. We compared quality and efficacy of the conventional general anesthesia technique with segmental thoracic spinal (STS) anesthesia technique used in modified radical mastectomy.

Methods: 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists II/III patients were divided into two groups Group C (Control group) and Group S (Study group). Group C patients were induced with standard anesthesia regimen while Group S patients were given STS at T4–T5 inter space with 1.5 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric levobupivacaine along with 15 µg of fentanyl with conscious sedation. Hemodynamics, pain score, time for first rescue analgesia, experience of anesthesiologist, surgeon, and patients were recorded.

Results: Time for induction in group S is significantly longer (Group C 17.4±3.8 vs. 36.2±7.2 min, in Group S). The duration of surgery (56±13.6 min vs. 76.4±15.9 min) was also significantly longer, while reversal period was shorter in Group S (9.2±6.2 and 6.3±5.7 min). Modified Aldrete’s recovery score achieved quickly in Group C (16.8±4.9 vs. 29.7±9.8 min), but postoperative analgesia was better in Group S as first rescue analgesic sode required after 6.2±1.9 h in Gr. S while in Gr. C time duration was 4.9±1.3 h. Length of stay in hospital was more in Group S, (Group C 45.4±4.8 vs. Group S 56.3±8.5 [h]) while ease and comfort of surgeon anesthesiologist and patient satisfaction score were more in Group C.

Conclusion: STS anesthesia is feasible for breast carcinoma surgeries but it is easier for surgeon and anesthesiologist to manage patient under general anesthesia. STS anesthesia has advantage in terms of early post-operative analgesia and will definitely be helpful in cases where patient is not fit for general anesthesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rostas JW, Dyess DL. Current operative management of breast cancer: An age of smaller resections and bigger cures. Int J Breast Cancer 2012;2012:516417. doi: 10.1155/2012/516417. Epub 2011 Dec 18. PMID: 22295246; PMCID: PMC3262599

Heaney A, Buggy DJ. Can anaesthetic and analgesic techniques affect cancer recurrence or metastasis? Br J Anaesth 2012;109(Suppl 1):i17- 28. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes421. PMID: 23242747

Kettner SC, Willschke H, Marhofer P. Does regional anaesthesia really improve outcome? Br J Anaesth 2011;107(Suppl 1):i90-5. doi: 10.1093/ bja/aer340. PMID: 22156274

Paliwal N, Maurya N, Suthar OP, Janweja S. Segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for breast cancer surgery: A prospective randomized-controlled open-label trial. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2022;38:560-5. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_679_20, PMID: 36778795; PMCID: PMC9912863

Elakany MH, Abdelhamid SA. Segmental thoracic spinal has advantages over general anesthesia for breast cancer surgery. Anesth Essays Res 2013;7:390-5. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.123263. PMID: 25885990; PMCID: PMC4173558

Dumestre DO, Redwood J, Webb CE, Temple-Oberle C. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol enables safe same-day discharge after alloplastic breast reconstruction. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2017;25:249-54. doi: 10.1177/2292550317728036, PMID: 29619347; PMCID: PMC5871068

Mertz BG, Kroman N, Williams H, Kehlet H. Fast-track surgery for breast cancer is possible. Dan Med J 2013;60:A4615. PMID: 23673259

Temple-Oberle C, Shea-Budgell MA, Tan M, Semple JL, Schrag C, Barreto M, et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in breast reconstruction: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139:1056e-71. doi: 10.1097/ PRS.0000000000003242, PMID: 28445352; PMCID: PMC9074892

Offodile AC 2nd, Gu C, Boukovalas S, Coroneos CJ, Chatterjee A, Largo RD, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in breast reconstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019;173:65-77. doi: 10.1007/ s10549-018-4991-8, PMID: 30306426

Sherwin A, Buggy DJ. Anaesthesia for breast surgery. BJA Educ 2018;18:342-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2018.08.002, PMID: 33456800; PMCID: PMC7807849

Li J, Li X, Tong X, Liu J, Huang B, Chen M, et al. Investigation of the optimal duration of bed rest in the supine position to reduce complications after lumbar puncture combined with intrathecal chemotherapy: A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer 2018;26:2995-3002. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018- 4142-0, PMID: 29546527; PMCID: PMC6096529

Moerman N, van Dam FS, Muller MJ, Oosting H. The amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale (APAIS). Anesth Analg 1996;82:445-51. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199603000-00002. PMID: 8623940

Published

07-01-2024

How to Cite

GUPTA, N., S. AGARWAL, and G. GOYAL. “QUALITY AND EFFICACY OF GENERAL ANESTHESIA VERSUS SEGMENTAL THORACIC SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN MODIFIED RADICAL MASTECTOMY SURGERY: A SINGLE-CENTER OBSERVATIONAL STUDY”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 17, no. 1, Jan. 2024, pp. 40-43, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i1.48626.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)