COMPARISION OF LICHTESTEIN OPEN TENSION-FREE VERSUS LAPROSCOPIC TOTALLY EXTRAPERTIONEAL TECHNIQUE FOR INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR

Authors

  • VINEET SHARMA Department of Surgery, National Institute of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • GIRISH BHARDWAJ Department of Surgery, RNT Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • VIVEK SAINI Department of Surgery, Government Medical College, Alwar, Rajasthan, India
  • PANKAJ PORWAL Department of General Surgery, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • ANIL KUMAR TRIPATHI Department of Surgery, Specialist General surgery ESIC Model Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i6.51619

Keywords:

Hernia, Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal, Lichtenstein

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to assess and compare Litchtenstein’s open tension-free and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) mesh repair.

Methods: This hospital-based comparative type of observational study was conducted on 50 cases for each of two groups at upgraded Department of General Surgery, SMS Hospital, Jaipur, between January 2014 and January 2016. All the cases of elective inguinal hernia coming to SMS outpatient department in a single surgical unit operated by a single surgeon in the given period which meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thus, collected data were entered in Microsoft Excel sheet and analysis was done by Epi info software of CDC.

Results: Total 100 patients were included in this study; 50 each in the two groups, the laparoscopic TEP group and open Lichtenstein group. Mean age in the laparoscopic group was 39.54 years and the open Lichtenstein group was 42.78 years. The mean pain score out of 10 at 24 h was 2.96 (±0.638) and 3.60 (±0.969) in TEP and Lichtenstein groups, respectively. The mean return to work for open group was 17.00 and TEP group was 11.34 days. There is no any recurrence and readmission in both groups.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic TEP repair may be done in all uncomplicated inguinal hernia by an experienced surgeon for those desiring less pain, better cosmotic results, less post-operative complications, less hospital stay, and early return to work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andersson B, Hallen M, Leveau P, Bergenfelz A, Westerdahl J. Laparoscopic extra peritoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Surgery. 2003;133:464-72.

Lichtenstein IL. Herniorrhapy: A Personal experience with 6321. Am J Surg. 1987;153(6):553-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(87)90153-x, PMID 3296805

Nyhus LM, Codon RE. The pre-peritoneal approach & illiopubictract repair of inguinal hernia. In: Codon RE, editor. Hernia. Philadelphia, PA: J B Lippincott Publishers Co.; 1995. p. 154-80.

Occelli G, Barrat C, Catheline JM, Voreux JP, Cueto-Rozon R, Champault G. laparoscopic treatment of inguinal hernias: Prospective evaluation of 757 cases treated by a totally extraperitoneal route. Hernia. 2000;4(2):81-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02353749

Suter M, Martinet O. Postoperative pulmonary dysfunction after bilateral inguinal hernia repair: A prospective randomized study comparing the stoppa procedure with laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair (TEP). Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002;12:420-5.

Lal P, Kajla RK, Chander J, Saha R, Ramteke VK. Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2003;17:850-6.

Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK, Lee F. Management of peritoneal tear during endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(10):1474-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8299-z, PMID 12072988

Liem MS, Van der Graaf Y, van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS, et al. Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(22):1541-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199705293362201, PMID 9164809

Kald A, Anderberg B, Smedh K, Karlsson M. Transperitoneal or totally extraperitoneal approach in laparoscopic hernia repair: Results of 491 consecutive herniorrhaphies. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1997;7:86-9.

Kuhry E, van Veen RE, Langeveld HR, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ. Open or endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair? A systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(2):161-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-0167-4, PMID 17171311

Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Koiuvkangas P, Hulkko A. A prospective randomized outcome and cost comparison of totally extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty versus Lichtenstein hernia operation among employed patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998;8:338-44.

Published

07-06-2024

How to Cite

SHARMA, V., G. BHARDWAJ, V. SAINI, P. PORWAL, and A. K. TRIPATHI. “COMPARISION OF LICHTESTEIN OPEN TENSION-FREE VERSUS LAPROSCOPIC TOTALLY EXTRAPERTIONEAL TECHNIQUE FOR INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 17, no. 6, June 2024, pp. 174-7, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i6.51619.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)