EVALUATION OF OUTCOME OF 48 CASES OF LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY AT TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL OF SOUTHERN RAJASTHAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i7.51884Keywords:
laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Ureteropelvic Junction obstruction, hydronephrosisAbstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of 48 cases of laparoscopic pyeloplasty at a tertiary care hospital of Southern Rajasthan where medical facilities are still evolving.
Methods: Data of 48 patients from the medical record department, who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty surgery in past 4 years (January 2019– January 2023) for primary ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction due to intrinsic UPJ abnormality or aberrant vessels, were analyzed retrospectively. Intraoperative findings, success rate, and complications were recorded.
Results: Pelvic reduction was required in 30 (62.5%) patients. The mean operative time was 182.4 min and the mean blood loss was 55 mL. The mean hospital stay was of 4.2 days. Success rate of laparoscopic pyeloplasty was 97%. Over all 10.41% of patients had complications.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty deals concomitant secondary stones with less morbidity and complications. It has better cosmetic outcome as compared to open techniques and similar long-term success rates. Hence, it can be concluded that laparoscopic pyeloplasty is an excellent current gold standard for primary UPJ obstruction.
Downloads
References
Inagaki T, Rha KH, Ong AM, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Current status. BJU Int. 2005;95(Suppl 2):102-5.
Mandhani A, Kumar D, Kumar A, Kapoor R, Dubey D, Srivastava A, et al. Safety profile and complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A critical analysis. J Endourol. 2005;19(7):797-802.
Yurkanin JP, Fuchs GJ. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloureteroplasty: A single institution’s 3-year experience. J Endourol. 2004;18(8):765-9.
Lopez-Pujals A, Leveillee RJ, Wong C. Application of strict radiologic criteria to define success in laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 2004;18(8):756-60.
Hanske J, Sanchez A, Schmid M, Meyer CP, Abdollah F, Roghmann F, et al. Comparison of 30-day perioperative outcomes in adults undergoing open versus minimally invasive pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Analysis of 593 patients in a prospective national database. World J Urol. 2015;33(12):2107-13.
Boylu U, Basatac C, Turan T, Onol FF, Gumus E. Comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive and open pyeloplasty. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012;22(10):968-71.
Schwentner C, Pelzer A, Neururer R, Springer B, Horninger W, Bartsch G, et al. Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre. BJU Int. 2007;100(4):880-5.
Türk IA, Davis JW, Winkelmann B, Deger S, Richter F, Fabrizio MD, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty--the method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. Eur Urol. 2002;42(3):268-75.
Klingler HC, Remzi M, Janetschek G, Kratzik C, Marberger MJ. Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. Eur Urol. 2003;44(3):340-5.
Eden CG, Cahill D, Allen JD. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases. BJU Int. 2001;88(6):526-31.
Soulié M, Salomon L, Patard JJ, Mouly P, Manunta A, Antiphon P, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A multicenter study of 55 procedures. J Urol. 2001;166(1):48-50.
Ramakumar S, Lancini V, Chan DY, Parsons JK, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy. J Urol. 2002;167(3):1378-80.
Hussain A, Whelan P, Piercey K, Kapoor A. McMaster experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Can J Urol. 2004;11(3):2299-302.
Frauscher F, Janetschek G, Klauser A, Peschel R, Halpern EJ, Pallwein L, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for UPJ obstruction with crossing vessels: Contrast-enhanced color Doppler findings and long-term outcome. Urology. 2002;59(4):500-5.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Pankaj Trivedi, Vishwas Baheti, Pushpendra Choudhary
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The publication is licensed under CC By and is open access. Copyright is with author and allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
