MRI in diagnosis and classification of mullerian duct anomalies: Case series

MRI in diagnosis and classification of mullerian duct anomalies

Authors

  • Bhavya Kataria Dr. Bhavya Kataria, MBBS, MD,DNB RADIODIAGNOSIS,EDIR,DICRI,MNAMS, Senior Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, RML Hospital, D-12 Tower 1 Type 4 East Kidwai Nagar, New Delhi 110023

Keywords:

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Mullerian duct anomalies (MDA), Ultrasonography (USG)

Abstract

Background: Mullerian duct anomalies (MDAs) arise from the aberrant development of the uterus, cervix, and vagina, impacting the potential for successful conception and full-term pregnancy. This category encompasses a diverse range of developmental defects, leading to a spectrum of clinical presentations such as amenorrhea, infertility, recurrent miscarriages, intrauterine growth retardation, malposition of the fetus, preterm labor, and retained placenta.

Case(s): In this study, we present 17 cases of MDA with a wide array of clinical manifestations. The varied symptoms included amenorrhea, infertility, repeated miscarriages, intrauterine growth retardation, malposition of the fetus, preterm labor, and retained placenta. Accurate categorization of these cases is crucial for determining the appropriate surgical intervention. While ultrasonography aids in the initial diagnosis of MDA, our focus on accurate classification necessitates the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Conclusions: Our findings underscore the significance of MRI in precisely categorizing MDA, facilitating effective management strategies. The 17 cases presented demonstrate the diverse spectrum of MDA manifestations, emphasizing the need for tailored surgical interventions for successful conception and optimal pregnancy outcomes. The use of MRI proves instrumental in guiding clinical decisions, offering a comprehensive understanding of Mullerian duct anomalies and informing targeted interventions to enhance reproductive success.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chandler TM, Machan LS, Cooperberg PL, Harris AC, Chang SD. Mullerian duct anomalies: from diagnosis to intervention. Br J Radiol. 2009 Dec;82(984):1034-42. doi: 10.1259/bjr/99354802.

Grover SB, Antil N, Katyan A, Rajani H, Grover H, Mittal P, Prasad S. Niche role of MRI in the evaluation of female infertility. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2020 Jan-Mar;30(1):32-45. doi: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_377_19.

Sugi MD, Penna R, Jha P, Pōder L, Behr SC, Courtier J, Mok-Lin E, Rabban JT, Choi HH. Müllerian Duct Anomalies: Role in Fertility and Pregnancy. Radiographics. 2021 Oct;41(6):1857-1875. doi: 10.1148/rg.2021210022.

Garratt J, Siegelman ES. MR Imaging of Müllerian Anomalies. Magn Reson Imaging Clin 2023;31:11-28.

Marten K, Vosshenrich R, Funke M, Obenauer S, Baum F, Grabbe E. MRI in the evaluation of müllerian duct anomalies. Clin Imaging. 2003 Sep-Oct;27(5):346-50. doi: 10.1016/s0899-7071(02)00587-9.

Behr SC, Courtier JL, Qayyum A. Imaging of müllerian duct anomalies. Radiographics. 2012 Oct;32(6):E233-50. doi: 10.1148/rg.326125515.

El Ameen NF, Ebraheem MA, El Dien NM. MR assessment of müllerian duct anomalies: Does it help?. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2014;45:561-7.

Olpin JD, Moeni A, Willmore RJ, Heilbrun ME. MR Imaging of Müllerian Fusion Anomalies. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2017 Aug;25(3):563-575. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2017.03.008.

Jegannathan D, Indiran V. Magnetic resonance imaging of classified and unclassified Müllerian duct anomalies: Comparison of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology classifications. SA J Radiol. 2018 Apr 23;22(1):1259. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v22i1.1259.

Robbins JB, Broadwell C, Chow LC, Parry JP, Sadowski EA. Müllerian duct anomalies: embryological development, classification, and MRI assessment. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Jan;41(1):1-12. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24771.

Guo X, Sun X, Xu H, Si S, Yu B, Liu J. Successful pregnancy in each half uterus cavity of the septate uterus after transferring three embryos in one half-cavity: a case report. J Ovarian Res 2013;6:1-3.

Selvaraj P, Selvaraj K. Reproductive outcome of septate uterus following hysteroscopic septum resection. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2010 Sep;3(3):143-5. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.74157.

Carrera M, Pérez Millan F, Alcázar JL, Alonso L, Caballero M, Carugno J, Dominguez JA, Moratalla E. Effect of Hysteroscopic Metroplasty on Reproductive Outcomes in Women with Septate Uterus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Apr;29(4):465-475. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.10.001.

Published

26-10-2024

How to Cite

Kataria, B. “MRI in Diagnosis and Classification of Mullerian Duct Anomalies: Case Series: MRI in Diagnosis and Classification of Mullerian Duct Anomalies”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 17, no. 11, Oct. 2024, https://mail.innovareacademics.in/journals/index.php/ajpcr/article/view/52702.

Issue

Section

Case Study(s)