A COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED SUPRACLAVICULAR VERSUS INFRACLAVICULAR BLOCKS FOR HAND AND FOREARM SURGERIES

ANANYA HAGJER; DEEPANNITA SUTRADHAR; RUPANKAR NATH; SUNEETA DUTTA

doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i12.52972

Authors

ANANYA HAGJER Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Silchar Medical College and Hospital, Silchar, Assam, India.
DEEPANNITA SUTRADHAR Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Silchar Medical College and Hospital, Silchar, Assam, India.
RUPANKAR NATH Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Silchar Medical College and Hospital, Silchar, Assam, India. https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6849-651X
SUNEETA DUTTA Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Silchar Medical College and Hospital, Silchar, Assam, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i12.52972

Keywords:

Ultrasound guidance,, upper limb block, supraclavicular block, infraclavicular block, brachial plexus

Abstract

Objective: Regional anesthesia, particularly techniques such as supraclavicular (SCB) and infraclavicular (ICB) blocks, is increasingly favored over general anesthesia for upper limb surgeries due to its safety and efficacy, especially with ultrasound guidance.

Methods: A study was conducted at Silchar Medical College and Hospital involving 120 patients undergoing elective hand and forearm surgeries. These patients were randomly divided into SCB and ICB groups. Each block was performed using ultrasound guidance with an 8-MHz ultrasonic linear scanning probe. Patients received pre-medication, including pantoprazole/ranitidine, ondansetron, and midazolam (anxiolytic dose), 15 min before the procedure. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of ultrasound guidance in SCB block versus ICB block in terms of sensory and motor block, time taken to visualize structures, block performance time, and observe other parameters such as complications.

Results: Significant differences were observed between the SCB and ICB groups in terms of systolic BP, diastolic BP, and mean arterial pressure (MAP). The SCB group exhibited a higher MAP, whereas the ICB group required more time for structure visualization and block performance. However, the ICB group achieved complete sensory blocks quicker than the SCB group. Needle advancements were more frequent in the SCB group as compared to the ICB group.

Conclusion: The study concluded that while the ICB group had a longer block performance time, it experienced fewer complications, making ultrasound-guided ICB block a more effective option for upper limb surgeries compared to the SCB block.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhandarkar P, Gadgil A, Patil P, Mohan M, Roy N. Estimation of the national surgical needs in India by enumerating the surgical procedures in an urban community under universal health coverage. World J Surg. 2021 Jan;45(1):33-40. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05794-7, PMID 32974741

Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Frederiksen BS, Rasmussen H, Hesselbjerg L. A comparison of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular blocks for upper extremity surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 May;53(5):620-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.01909.x, PMID 19419356

Abhinaya RJ, Venkatraman R, Matheswaran P, Sivarajan G. A randomised comparative evaluation of supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches to brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries using both ultrasound and nerve stimulator. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61(7):581-6. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_402_16, PMID 28794531

Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Frederiksen BS, Rasmussen H, Hesselbjerg L. A comparison of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular blocks for upper extremity surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 May;53(5):620-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.01909.x, PMID 19419356

Horlocker TT, Kopp SL, Wedel DJ. Peripheral Nerve Blocks. Miller’s Anaesthesia. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2014. p. 1721-51.

Kapral S, Jandrasits O, Schabernig C, AQ25 et al. Supraclavicular versus infraclavicular brachial plexus block for hand and forearm surgery. Anesthesiology. 1999;91(5):1315-22.

Mallik A, Chandra K. A comparative study of quality of ultrasound guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular blocks for upper limb surgery. Galore Int J Health Sci Res. 2020 Oct-Dec;5(4):1-13.

Kilka M, Geiger P, Zgaggen W, et al. Reg Anesthcular vs supraclavicular brachial plexus block for pain relief after shoulder surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35(5):445-51.

Minville V, Fourcade O, Bourdet B, et al. Supraclavicular versus infraclavicular brachial plexus block: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(3):684-8.

Abdalziz AR, Masoud SM, Balata AA, El Harrisi MA. Supraclavicular versus infraclavicular brachial plexus block using two different techniques: Comparative study. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2021 Jul 1;84(1):2108-14. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2021.180865

Stav A, Reytman L, Stav MY, Portnoy I, Kantarovsky A, Galili O, et al. Comparison of the supraclavicular, infraclavicular and axillary approaches for ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block for surgical anesthesia. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2016 Apr 19;7(2):e0013. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10240, PMID 27101216

Park SK, Lee SY, Kim WH, Park HS, Lim YJ, Bahk JH. Comparison of supraclavicular and infraclavicular brachial plexus block: A systemic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2017b;124(2):636- 44. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001713, PMID 27828793

Hadzic A. Hadzic’s Textbook of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management 2nd ed. The New York School of Regional Anesthesia. Vol. 2017. United States: McGraw-Hill Education; 2017.

El-Sawy A, Mohamed NN, Mansour MA, Salem MR. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular versus infraclavicular brachial plexus nerve block in chronic renal failure patients undergoing arteriovenous fistula creation. Egypt J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;30(2):161-7. doi: 10.1016/j. egja.2013.12.006

Arcand G, Williams SR, Chouinard P, Boudreault D, Harris P, Ruel M, et al. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular versus supraclavicular block. Anesth Analg. 2005 Sep;101(3):886-90. doi: 10.1213/01. ANE.0000159168.69934.CC, PMID 16116009

Yang CW, Kwon HU, Cho CK, Jung SM, Kang PS, Park ES, et al. A comparison of infraclavicular and supraclavicular approaches to the brachial plexus using neurostimulation. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010;58(3):260-6. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2010.58.3.260, PMID 20498775

Fredrickson MJ, Patel A, Young S, Chinchanwala S. Speed of onset of corner pocket spraclavicular and infraclavicular ltrasound guided brachial plexus block: A randomized observer-blinded comparison. J Assoc Anaesth Great Britain Ireland. 2009;64:738-44.