COMPARISON OF SEVOFLURANE AND ISOFLURANE ON HEMODYNAMICS AND RECOVERY CHARACTERISTICS IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Authors

  • VISHALDEEP SINGH Department of Anaesthesia, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India.
  • PARMOD KUMAR Department of Anaesthesia, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India
  • TRIPAT KAUR BINDRA Department of Anaesthesia, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India
  • JAGJIT SINGH Department of Anaesthesia, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India
  • SIMRIT KAUR Department of Anaesthesia, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India
  • LALIT KUMAR GARG Department of Anaesthesia, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i12.53248

Keywords:

sevoflurane, isoflurane, hemodynamics, geriatric patients, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare sevoflurane and isoflurane on hemodynamics and recovery characteristics in geriatric patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods: The prospective, comparative, and randomized study was conducted on a total of 80 patients aged above 60 years of either sex and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II who were scheduled for elective LC under general anesthesia in Government Medical College, Rajindra Hospital, Patiala.

Results: Patients were hemodynamically stable throughout the surgery in both the groups but the emergence and recovery were significantly faster in the sevoflurane group. The sevoflurane group showed a faster time to spontaneous breathing, time to eye-opening, response to verbal commands, extubation time, and early orientation of the patient.

Conclusion: Sevoflurane might be considered a useful alternative to isoflurane in providing anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomies, especially in elderly patients where rapid emergence and recovery are very much desired along with stable hemodynamic parameters.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Shnaider I, Chung F. Outcomes in day surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Dec;19(6):622-9. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328010107e, PMID 17093366

Smith I, Cooke T, Jackson I, Fitzpatrick R. Rising to the challenges of achieving day surgery targets. Anaesthesia. 2006 Dec;61(12):1191-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04875.x, PMID 17090241

Cunningham AJ, Brull SJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and general anaesthesia: Anaesthetic implications. Anesth Analg. 1993;76(5):1120- 33. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199305000-00035, PMID 8053989

Maheshwari K, Ahuja S, Mascha EJ, Cummings KC 3rd, Chahar P, Elsharkawy H, et al. Effect of sevoflurane versus isoflurane on emergence time and postanesthesia care unit length of stay: An alternating intervention trial. Anesth Analg. 2020 Feb 1;130(2):360-6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004093, PMID 30882520

Juvin P, Servin F, Giraud O, Desmonts JM. Emergence of elderly patients from prolonged desflurane, isoflurane, or propofol anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1997 Sep 1;85(3):647-51. doi: 10.1097/00000539- 199709000-00029, PMID 9296424

Lobo SA, Ojeda J, Dua A, Singh K, Lopez J. Minimum Alveolar Concentration. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; ???.

Longo MA, Cavalheiro BT, de Oliveira Filho GR. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under neuraxial anesthesia compared with general anesthesia: Systematic review and meta-analyses. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Sep;41:48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.06.005, PMID 28802605

Hayden P, Cowman S. Anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2011 Oct 1;11(5):177-80. doi: 10.1093/ bjaceaccp/mkr027

Eger EI 2nd. The pharmacology of isoflurane. Br J Anaesth. 1984 Jan 1;56 Suppl 1:71S-99. PMID 6391530

Kharasch ED. Biotransformation of sevoflurane. Anesth Analg. 1995 Dec 1;81(6 Suppl):S27-38. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199512001-00005

Jindal R, Kumra VP, Narani KK, Sood J. Comparison of maintenance and emergence characteristics after desflurane or sevoflurane in outpatient anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2011 Jan 1;55(1):36-42. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.76604, PMID 21431051

Smith I, Ding Y, White PF. Comparison of induction, maintenance, and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane-N2O and propofol-sevoflurane- N2O with propofol-isoflurane-N2O anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1992 Feb 1;74(2):253-9. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199202000-00015, PMID 1731547

Sahu DK, Kaul V, Parampill R. Comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane in anaesthesia for day care surgeries using classical laryngeal mask airway. Indian J Anaesth. 2011 Jul 1;55(4):364-9. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.84857, PMID 22013252

Katoh T, Suguro Y, Ikeda T, Kazama T, Ikeda K. Influence of age on awakening concentrations of sevoflurane and isoflurane. Anesth Analg. 1993 Feb 1;76(2):348-52. PMID 8424514

Geng YJ, Wu QH, Zhang RQ. Effect of propofol, sevoflurane, and isoflurane on postoperative cognitive dysfunction following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2017 May 1;38:165-71. doi: 10.1016/j. jclinane.2017.02.007, PMID 28372661

Published

07-12-2024

How to Cite

VISHALDEEP SINGH, PARMOD KUMAR, TRIPAT KAUR BINDRA, JAGJIT SINGH, SIMRIT KAUR, and LALIT KUMAR GARG. “COMPARISON OF SEVOFLURANE AND ISOFLURANE ON HEMODYNAMICS AND RECOVERY CHARACTERISTICS IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 17, no. 12, Dec. 2024, pp. 227-31, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i12.53248.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)