ISOLATION AND CHARACTERISTICS OF BOVINE SKIN GELATIN AND ANALYSIS OF GLYCINE, PROLINE, AND HYDROXYPROLINE BY HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHYFLUORESCENCE

Authors

  • Dini Khoirunnisa Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia.
  • Harmita . Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia.
  • Taufiq Indra Rukmana Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2018.v10s1.60

Keywords:

Bovine gelatin, Glycine, Proline, Hydroxyproline, Derivatization, 9-fluorenyl-methoxycarbonyl chloride, High-performance liquid chromatography, Optimization

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to isolate gelatin, determine its characteristics, and obtain analytical methods optimum for the determination of glycine,
proline, and hydroxyproline levels in bovine gelatin.
Methods: Bovine hide was hydrolyzed using 2% sodium hydroxide at an extraction temperature of 70°C for 3 h and a drying temperature of 60°C.
Then, the gelatin extracts were evaluated using an organoleptic test; Fourier transform infrared analysis; pH measurement; and ash content, moisture
content, and viscosity tests. Optimum analysis conditions for the determination of glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline levels in bovine gelatin using
high-performance liquid chromatography with a fluorescence detector were as follows: Excitation wavelength, 265 nm; emission wavelength, 320 nm;
mobile phase composition of acetic buffer: acetonitrile, 55:45; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; C18 column with length 250 mm and inner diameter 4.6 mm;
and particle size, 5 μm. Derivatization of amino acids was performed using the reagent 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl chloride.
Results: The results showed average levels of glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline in bovine gelatin, i.e., 25.10±0.09%, 14.28±0.11%, and 13.0±0.05%,
respectively.
Conclusion: The optimum conditions for bovine gelatin hydrolysis included HCl with heating for 22 h at 110°C. The hydroxyproline, glycine, and
proline levels obtained for analysis in bovine gelatin samples were 13.50±0.05%, 25.11±0.09%, and 14.28±0.11%, respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gelatin Manufacturer’s Institute of America. Standard Methods for the

Testing of Edible Gelatin. America: Gelatin Manufacturers Institute of

America, Inc; 2012.

Setiawati IH. Quality Characteristics of Chemical Physics Gelatin

Skin Red Snapper (Lutjanus sp) as Process of Acid Treatment. Bogor:

Institut Pertanian Bogor; 2009.

Mazumder R, Allamneni Y, Firdous SM, Parya H, Chowdhury AD.

Formulation, development and in-vitro release effects of ethyl cellulose

coated pectin microspheres for colon targeting. Asian J Pharm Clin Res

;6:138-44.

Farshid A, Lakshmi CS. Formulation of nanoparticles of anti-migraine drugs

triptans by coacervation method. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2017;10:122-8.

Princely S, Saleem BN, Nandhakumar S, Dhanaraju MD. Controlled

delivery of antiretroviral drug-loaded cross-linked microspheres by

ionic gelation method. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2016;9:264-71.

Hafidz RM, Yaakob CM, Amin I, Noorfaizan A. Chemical and functional

properties of bovine and porcine skin gelatin. Int Food Res J 2011;18:813-7.

Puspawati NM, Simpen IN, Miwada IN. Isolation of Gelatin from

Broiler Chicken Skin and Functional Group Characteristics with FTIR

Spectrophotometry. Denpasar: Department of Chemistry, Faculty of

Animal Sciences, Universitas Udayana; 2012.

Fabiani A, Versari A, Parpinello GP, Castellari M, Galassi S. Highperformance

liquid chromatographic analysis of free amino acids in

fruit juices using derivatization with 9-Fluorenylmethyl-Chloroformate.

J Chromatogr Sci 2002;40:14-8.

Published

20-12-2018

How to Cite

Khoirunnisa, D., ., H., & Rukmana, T. I. (2018). ISOLATION AND CHARACTERISTICS OF BOVINE SKIN GELATIN AND ANALYSIS OF GLYCINE, PROLINE, AND HYDROXYPROLINE BY HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHYFLUORESCENCE. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics, 10(1), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2018.v10s1.60

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)