FORMULATION DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF NASAL IN-SITU GEL OF FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE
##semicolon##
32 factorial design##common.commaListSeparator## In-situ nasal gel##common.commaListSeparator## Fluticasone Propionate##common.commaListSeparator## Mucoadhesive##article.abstract##
Objective: Over a few decades, advances in the in-situ gel technologies have spurred development in may medical and biomedical applications including controlled drug delivery. For locally acting intra nasal drugs, an extended residence time in the nasal cavity is desirable and related to a prolonged effect. The aim of the present work was to design a nasal delivery system with improved mucoadhesive properties that could provide prolonged retention time for the treatment of the allergic rhinitis.
Methods: A 32 factorial design was used to investigate the effect of the amount of Poloxamer 188 and carbopol 934 as independent variables. % drug release and mucoadhesive strength were taken as dependent variables. The formulations were tested for gelation study, viscosity study, gel strength, mucoadhesion study, drug content and stability study. Gelation was determined by physical appearance, viscosity study of solution and gel formulations indicated that increase in polymer concentration increase the viscosity.
Results: Gel strength was found in the range of 0.55-2.36 sec. The mucoadhesive force in terms of detachment stress increase with an increase in the concentration of carbopol 934. A stability study for optimized formulation as per ICH guideline for 90 d showed no change in pH, drug content and viscosity.
Conclusion: The developed in-situ gelling system for Fluticasone Propionate using poloxamer188 in combination with carbopol 934 with improved mucoadhesive properties that could provide prolonged retention time for the treatment of allergic rhinitis.
##submission.citations##
Bommer R. Drug delivery-nasal route. In: swarbrick J, Boylan JC. 2nd edition. Encyclopedia of pharmaceutical technology; 2011;2:854-855, 860.
Jadhav AJ, Gondkar SB, Saudagar RB. A review on nasal drug delivery system. World J Pharm Pharm Sci 2014;3:231-54.
Gowada DV, Tanuja D, Mohammed S Khan, Desai J, Shivakumar HG. Formulation and evaluation of In-Situ gel of diltiazem hydrochloride for nasal delivery, Scholars Res Library 2011;3:371-2.
Drug bank [Internet]; 2014. Available from: http://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB00315. [Last accessed on 15 Jan 2014]
More PK, Saudagar RB, Gondkar SB. In-situ gel: a novel approaches for nasal drug delivery system. World J Pharm Res 2015;4:686-708.
Jadhav AJ, Gondkar SB, Saudagar RB. A review on nasal drug delivery system. World J Pharm Pharm Sci 2014;3:231-54.
Raymond CR, Paul JS, Sian CO. Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients. 5th ed. Pharmaceutical Press; 2006. p. 61-63, 120-123, 545-550, 690-692, 821-823.
Mark Gibson. Pharmaceutical Preformulation and Formulation. 2nd Edition. Drugs and Pharmaceutical Sciences; 1999. p. 457-465, 489, 308.
Infrared Spectroscopy. In: Pavia DL, Lampman GM, Kriz GS, Vyayan JR. editors. Spectroscopy. New Delhi: Cengage learning; 2011. p. 38-9.
Bolten S, Bon C. Factorial Designs. Experimental design in clinical trials. 5th ed. Pharmaceutical Statics Practical and Clinical Applications. Informa healthcare. Marcel Dekker; 2010. p. 203:222-236, 265-280.
Brookfield Engineering Labs., Inc., Brookfield Viscometer; type DV-II+PRO Instruction manual, Manual No. M03-165-E0211; 2015. p. 5-23.
Bajpaivibha. In-situ gel nasal drug delivery system-a review. Int J Pharma Sci 2016;4:577-80.
Sahu BP, Sharma HK. Development and evaluation of mucoadhesive nasal gel of felodipine prepared with the mucoadhesive substance of dillleniaindica L. Asian J Pharm Sci 2011;5:175-87.
Jaiswal J, Anantvar SP, Narkhede MR, Gore SV, Mehta K. Formulation and evaluation of thermoreversible in-situ nasal gel of metoprolol succinate. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2012;4:96-102.