PITFALLS IN AUTOPSY TISSUE SAMPLING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i3.4010Keywords:
Autopsy sampling, Histopathology examination, AutolysisAbstract
Objective: To determine the pre-analytic factor which lead to autolysis in tissue sample thus hindering the establishment of histo-pathological cause of death in some autopsy tissue samples.
Methods: Data collected from April, 2017 to September, 2018 (18 mo) at Department of Pathology, Dr. S. N. Medical College, Jodhpur.
Results: The study, conducted over 18 mo from April 2017 to September 2018 at the Department of Pathology, Dr. S. N. Medical College, Jodhpur, analyzed 637 autopsy cases. These cases were predominantly from urban areas (70.17%), with a lesser number from rural regions (29.83%). A total of 698 tissue samples were received in various containers, with the majority (95.71%) preserved in formalin. The examination revealed that 38.4% of the samples were not autolysed, 36.1% were partially autolysed, and 25.5% were completely autolysed. The findings highlight a significant impact of the pre-analytic phase on tissue sample quality, notably the interval between death and autopsy, which was less than 24 h in 86.19% of cases, and the time from autopsy to histopathological examination, which ranged up to 1044 d. These factors were pivotal in the preservation status of the tissues, with formalin proving to be the most effective fixative in preventing autolysis, thus facilitating the accurate establishment of histopathological causes of death.
Conclusion: If autopsy specimens are submitted for histopathological examination with proper protocol of transfer to fixative solution and transportation of tissue, this will help in determining the cause of death in majority of the autopsy specimens, therefore avoiding false negative results.
Downloads
References
Spitz WU, Fisher RS. Medicolegal investigation of death. In: Spitz and Fisher’s medicolegal investigation of death: guidelines for the application of pathology to crime investigation. 4th ed. CRC Press; 2006.
Jaffe R. Diagnosing death: histopathologic findings in forensic pathology. Acad Pathol. 2009;13(3):130-41.
Hiss J, Wilke N, Jachertz D. The role of histopathology in forensic autopsy-the german experience. Forensic Sci Int. 2014;234:11-7.
Lumb PD. Role of histopathology in post-mortem examination: a review of its current applications and value in the medico-legal setting. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2017;13(2):173-80.
Shojania KG, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman L. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA. 2003;289(21):2849-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.21.2849, PMID 12783916.
Roberts IS, Benamore RE, Benbow EW, Lee SH, Harris JN, Jackson A. Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study. Lancet. 2012;379(9811):136-42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61483-9, PMID 22112684.
Carson FL, Hladik C. Histotechnology: a self-instructional text. American Society for Clinical Pathology; 2009.
Suvarna SK, Layton C, Bancroft JD. Bancroft’s theory and practice of histological techniques. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2018.
Kiernan JA. Formaldehyde, formalin, paraformaldehyde and glutaraldehyde: what they are and what they do. Microsc Today. 2000;8(1):8-13. doi: 10.1017/S1551929500057060.
Sane MR, Mugadlimath AB, Zine KU, Farooqui JM, Phalke BJ. Course of near-hanging victims succumbed to death: a seven-year study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(3):HC01-3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11189.5647, PMID 25954634.
College of American Pathologists. CAP laboratory accreditation program: anatomic pathology checklist. College of American Pathologists; 2020.
World Health Organization. WHO laboratory biosafety manual. 3rd ed. World Health Organization; 2011.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 PRIYANKA BANSOD, ANAND RAJ KALLA, MAHAVEER CHOYAL, AMRIT RAJ KALLA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.