Analysis of Academic Achievement of Graduates from XYZ University in Relation to Career Alignment

Authors

  • Mesterjon Faculty of Education, Dehasen University, Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Suwarni Physical Education Program, Dehasen University, Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Dwi Rulismi Early Childhood Education, Teacher Program, Dehasen University, Indonesia
  • Supama Mathematics Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Azharuddin Sahil Northern University of Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2024v12i1.50109

Keywords:

academic performance, achievement, evaluation, graduates

Abstract

The current research outlines the findings of our study on the relationship between the academic achievements of XYZ University (Dehasen University) graduates and the alignment of their chosen career fields. The research results indicate a positive correlation between graduates’ academic performance and suitability in their chosen career fields, as confirmed through the discussion. Graduates with an average academic performance score of ≥ high, as seen in the Cumulative Achievement Score (CPKL) graph, tend to be more suitable in their respective career fields. The result reflects the importance of quality education in preparing graduates for the job market. The study’s primary findings reveal a positive relationship between academic performance and career field suitability. There is a strong correlation between the level of academic achievement graduates attain during their studies and the level of suitability in the career fields they choose after graduation. The results were supported by findings such as CPKL with an average achievement ≤ 3.00, Academic Field Achievement Score (CBAL) findings ≤ 2.50, Non-Academic Achievement Score (CPNAL) findings with an average achievement ≤ 3.20, Work Area Size Achievement Score (CULKL) findings with an average achievement ≤ 3.50, and Job Field Suitability Achievement Score (CKBKL) achievement with an average score ≤ 2.80. Graduates who achieve better academic performance are more successful in pursuing careers in fields that align with their previous study programs. Furthermore, the research also reveals that several determining factors for career field suitability are influenced by the field’s scope, internship experiences, non-academic achievements, and support from the university. Students with a strong interest in specific fields or relevant internship experience tend to find suitable employment more quickly.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bailey, K. F. (2018). Methods of social research. The Free Press.

Balta, N., Mason, A. J., & Singh, C. (2016). Surveying Turkish high school and university students’ attitudes and approaches to physics problem-solving. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1),1-16. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010129

Barnes, & Noble College. (2018). Getting to know gen Z: Exploring middle and high schoolers’ expectations for higher education. Author.

Blais, A. (2000). To vote or not to vote: The merits and limits of rational choice theory. University of Pittsburgh Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, D. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.

DeGroot, M. H., & Schervish, M. J. (2011). Probability and Statistics (4th ed.). Addison-Wesley.

Giray, L. (2022). Meet the centennials: Understanding the generation Z students. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Sciences Reviews, 2(4), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.14456/jsasr.2022.26

Jusoh, R., & Mlibari, N. A. R. M. (2018). Predictors of quality teaching in Makkah primary schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 7(4), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v7-i4/4799

Kukreja, J. (2019). Holacracy: The next generation leadership in a VUCA world. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 3(6), 37–47.

Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2019). Practical research: Planning and design. Pearson Internasional.

Mesterjon, M., Rulismi, D., & Sapri, J. (2023). Analysis of blended learning models using Technology 4.0 to improve critical thinking skills. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 6(2), 183–196.

Mesterjon, M., Suwarni, S., Selviani, D., & Monang, S. (2022). Analysis of learning system in higher collection through a Technology 4.0 approach in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(3), 355–360. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i3.110

Mesterjon. (2021). Learning system management theory and concept 4.0. Deepublish. Ygyakarta.

Mesterjon. (2023). Evaluation of demonstration learning models in improving. Eliva Press Global Ltd.

Owenvbuigie, R. O., & Egbri, J. N. (2021). Use of modern technology for teaching by business educators during COVID-19 era. SSRN Electronic Journal, 9(3), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3814156

Rodionov, M. A., Tsarapkina, J. M., Kulagina, J. A., Morozova, I. M., & Tkacheva, N. A. (2021). Formation of students’ competitiveness in the vuca world. Eduweb, 15(3), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2021.15.03.14

Salakhova, V. B., Masalimova, A. R., Belyakova, N. V., Morozova, N. S., Osipova, N. V., & Prokopyev, A. I. (2021). Competitive teacher for higher education: Risk-based models of its development. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(10), Article em2021. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11187

Schwieger, D., & Ladwig, C. (2018). Reaching and retaining the next generation: Adapting to the expectations of gen Z in the classroom. Information Systems. Education Journal, 16(3), 45–54. https://bit.ly/3AEvsvG

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. SAGE Publications.

Published

01-01-2024

How to Cite

Mesterjon, Suwarni, Rulismi, D., Supama, & Sahil, A. (2024). Analysis of Academic Achievement of Graduates from XYZ University in Relation to Career Alignment. Innovare Journal of Education, 12(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2024v12i1.50109

Issue

Section

Research Article(s)