The Effect of Improvised Computer-Based Software Package on Secondary School Students’ Achievement and Attitude Towards Mathematics

Authors

  • Etukudo Udobia Elijah Department of Mathematics Education, Federal College of Education (Technical), Omoku, Rivers State, Nigeria
  • Egba Anwaitu Freser Department of Computer and Robotics, Federal College of Education (Technical), Omoku, Rivers State, Nigeria https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5742-307X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2024v12i4.51685

Keywords:

Mathematics, improvisation, computer-based software package, achievement, attitude

Abstract

The study was conducted to determine the effect of improvised computer-based software on the achievement and attitude of senior secondary school students towards mathematics. Fifteen secondary school mathematics teachers were trained to produce a computer-based software package and use the package to teach ‘graphical solution to quadratic equations’ to senior secondary class one (SSCI) students. A total sample of 1487 SSCI students was used in the study: 745 students in the 15 secondary schools purposively selected on the rationale of their closeness to a computer center, used as the experimental group, and 742 students from the 15 schools randomly selected for use as the control group. Pre-test, post-test, and quasi-experimental research designs were used to conduct the study. Fifteen intact classes were simultaneously used for treatment in the experimental and control groups. The experimental groups were taught with computers using the computer-based software package on teaching graphical solutions to quadratics equations produced by their teacher, while the control groups were taught using the conventional strategy. The result reveals a significant difference in academic achievement between students taught with improvised computer-based software packages and those taught using the conventional strategy. The mean achievement score of 73% and standard deviation of 9% was obtained from the experimental group, while the control group had a mean achievement of 57% and standard deviation of 5%.

Similarly, the experimental group had an attitude test score of 82% and a standard deviation of 6%, while the control group had a mean attitude test score of 59% and a standard deviation of 11%. This gave the calculated value of the t-test as t = 42.3 for achievement and t = 50.1 for attitude, showing a significant difference in achievement and attitude between the experimental and control groups. Thus, an improvised computer-based software package is more effective in teaching mathematics than the conventional strategy. Hence, improvising computer-based software for teaching and learning is highly recommended.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benitex, I. P (2016). Development of computer-based training to supplement lessons in fundamentals of electronics. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4(2), 122 -129.

Chen, J. W., & Shen, C. W. (1989). Components for institutional software development. Educational Technology, 29(9), 9–5.

Garba, M., Umar, Z., & Hu, S. (2010). Development of computer-based learning system for teaching and assessing mathematics. International Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 6(2), 196–205.

Ingram, R. (1985). Simultaneous interpretation of sign languages: Semiotic and psycholinguistic perspectives. Multilingua, 4(2), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1985.4.2.91

Michael, J. P., & Igenewari, S. (2022). Assessment of computer-based instruction (CBI) techniques in teaching of computer studies in Rivers State senior secondary schools. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 12(2), 376–385. http://dx.doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.12.02.2022.p12251

Pappas, C. (2014). Institutional design models and theories: Computer-Based instructional theory. E-learning Industry. Retrieved March 12, 2024, from https://elearningindustry.com/computer-based-instruction-theory

Rohmah, F. N. (2019). Developing computer-based instructional media for English speaking skill at senior high school. Journal of English Teaching, 5(9), 63-76.

Rosenthal, L. (1976). Model for implementation for computer-based instructional system. Educational Technology, 16(2), 13–22.

Rouse, M. (2022, June 17). What Does Computer-Based Learning Mean? Technopedia. Retrieved March 12, 2024, from https://www.techopedia.com/definition/11167/computer-based-learning-cbl

Ruliah, D., Syahrial, Z., & Muchtar, H. (2019). The computer assisted instruction model based on a combination of tutorial model and drill and practice model in the instructional design of database systems in information technology colleges. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9A), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071614

van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Martens, R. (2002). Computer-based tools for instructional design: An introduction to the special issue. ETR&D 50, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504980

Published

01-07-2024

How to Cite

Udobia Elijah , E. ., & Anwaitu Freser, E. (2024). The Effect of Improvised Computer-Based Software Package on Secondary School Students’ Achievement and Attitude Towards Mathematics. Innovare Journal of Education, 12(4), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2024v12i4.51685

Issue

Section

Research Article(s)